Hong Yuan, Wang Hanlin, Luyang Wang, Qiao Yang, Chen Bo
Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Mar;112:397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.11.093. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
Comparison of the treatment effects of immediate stent implantation versus staged stent implantation after AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis.
A study included 80 patients with acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis formed between June 2021 and February 2023. They were divided into 2 groups: the direct implantation group (37 patients, 9 males) and the staged implantation group (43 patients, 10 males). Venous angiography and Villata scoring were used to assess patency rates and the occurrence of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS). A 1-year follow-up was conducted and a multiple-factor Cox regression model was used to analyze the clinical factors affecting patency rates.
Surgery was successfully completed without serious complications or deaths during follow-up. The direct implantation group had significantly shorter hospital stays and surgical times compared to the staged implantation group (P < 0.001). Both groups showed a decrease in Villata scores (P < 0.001), and the direct group had higher scores than the staged group at 12 months postsurgery (P < 0.001). One year after the procedure, there was no significant difference in stent patency rates (P = 0.658), but postoperative scores at 1 month (P = 0.012) and stent length (P = 0.015) had a significant impact.
For acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis, both direct stent implantation and staged implantation are effective. The direct implantation procedure has shorter hospital stays and surgical times, whereas staged implantation has a lower long-term risk of PTS. Villata scores at 1 month after surgery can predict the risk of vascular obstruction. Longer stents may reduce the risk of postoperative obstruction.
急性髂股静脉血栓形成患者在AngioJet机械血栓清除术后即刻支架植入与分期支架植入治疗效果的比较。
本研究纳入了2021年6月至2023年2月期间形成急性髂股静脉血栓的80例患者。他们被分为两组:直接植入组(37例患者,9例男性)和分期植入组(43例患者,10例男性)。采用静脉血管造影和Villata评分评估通畅率和血栓形成后综合征(PTS)的发生情况。进行了为期1年的随访,并使用多因素Cox回归模型分析影响通畅率的临床因素。
手术成功完成,随访期间无严重并发症或死亡。与分期植入组相比,直接植入组的住院时间和手术时间显著缩短(P < 0.001)。两组的Villata评分均下降(P < 0.001),且直接植入组在术后12个月时的评分高于分期植入组(P < 0.001)。术后1年,支架通畅率无显著差异(P = 0.658),但术后1个月的评分(P = 0.012)和支架长度(P = 0.015)有显著影响。
对于急性髂股静脉血栓形成,直接支架植入和分期植入均有效。直接植入手术的住院时间和手术时间较短,而分期植入的PTS长期风险较低。术后1个月的Villata评分可预测血管阻塞风险。更长的支架可能降低术后阻塞风险。