Suppr超能文献

急诊科胸痛患者住院的预测因素及风险评估

Predictive Factors and Risk Assessment for Hospitalization in Chest Pain Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department.

作者信息

Kagansky Nadya, Mazor David, Wajdi Ayashi, Maler Yaron Yulia, Sharfman Miya, Ziv Baran Tomer, Kagansky Dana, Pachys Gal, Levy Yochai, Trotzky Daniel

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.

Shmuel Harofeh Geriatric Medical Center, Be'er Ya'akov 7033001, Israel.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 5;14(23):2733. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232733.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chest pain is one of the most common reasons for emergency department (ED) visits. Patients presenting with inconclusive symptoms complicate the diagnostic process and add to the burden upon the ED. This study aimed to determine factors possibly influencing ED decisions on hospitalization versus discharge for patients with the diagnosis of chest pain.

METHODS

In the cohort study including 400 patients admitted to the emergency unit with a working diagnosis of chest pain, data on demographics, medical history, symptoms, lab results, and risk scores were collected from the medical records of patients admitted to the ED with a working diagnosis of chest pain. To reduce potential bias, the analysis was restricted to 330 patients who were referred to the ED by a primary care provider or clinic for chest pain.

RESULTS

Of 330 patients admitted to the ED, 58.5% were discharged, and 41.5% were hospitalized. Hospitalized patients were significantly older, with a median age of 70 versus 57 years for those discharged ( < 0.001). A higher proportion of hospitalizations occurred during the late-night shift. Significant predictors of hospitalization included hyperlipidemia (OR 3.246), diaphoresis (OR 8.525), dyspnea (OR 2.897), and hypertension (OR 1.959). Nursing home residents had a lower risk of hospitalization (OR 0.381). The area under the ROC curve for this model was 0.801 (95% CI: 0.753-0.848), indicating the predictive accuracy of the model in estimating the probability of admission. The HEART (history, ECG, age, risk factors, and troponin level) score was more effective than the TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) score in predicting the need for hospitalization, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.807 compared to 0.742 for TIMI.

CONCLUSIONS

The HEART score in comparison with TIMI score proved especially valuable for quick risk assessment for hospitalization. The model that included hyperlipidemia, diaphoresis, dyspnea, and hypertension was the most predictive for the risk of hospitalization. Further research with larger populations is needed to validate these findings.

摘要

背景

胸痛是急诊科就诊的最常见原因之一。症状不明确的患者使诊断过程复杂化,并增加了急诊科的负担。本研究旨在确定可能影响急诊科对胸痛诊断患者住院或出院决策的因素。

方法

在这项队列研究中,纳入了400例因初步诊断为胸痛而入住急诊科的患者,从因初步诊断为胸痛而入住急诊科的患者病历中收集了人口统计学、病史、症状、实验室检查结果和风险评分等数据。为减少潜在偏倚,分析仅限于由初级保健提供者或诊所转诊至急诊科的330例胸痛患者。

结果

在入住急诊科的330例患者中,58.5%出院,41.5%住院。住院患者年龄显著更大,中位年龄为70岁,而出院患者为57岁(<0.001)。更高比例的住院发生在夜班期间。住院的显著预测因素包括高脂血症(OR 3.246)、出汗(OR 8.525)、呼吸困难(OR 2.897)和高血压(OR 1.959)。养老院居民住院风险较低(OR 0.381)。该模型的ROC曲线下面积为0.801(95%CI:0.753 - 0.848),表明该模型在估计入院概率方面的预测准确性。在预测住院需求方面,HEART(病史、心电图、年龄、危险因素和肌钙蛋白水平)评分比TIMI(心肌梗死溶栓)评分更有效,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.807和0.742。

结论

与TIMI评分相比,HEART评分在快速评估住院风险方面特别有价值。包括高脂血症、出汗、呼吸困难和高血压的模型对住院风险的预测性最强。需要对更多人群进行进一步研究以验证这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6632/11640250/31d4a8a5e175/diagnostics-14-02733-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验