Mølstrøm Jacob Pilegaard, Lange Natascha, Pareek Manan, Thomassen Anders, Nielsen Anne Lerberg, Høilund-Carlsen Poul Flemming, Godballe Christian, Rohde Max
Research Unit for ORL-Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 9;14(23):2764. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232764.
: The objectives of this study were (1) to systematically review the currently used definitions of incidental 2-deoxy-2-[F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings (IPFs) in the literature and (2) to propose an IPF definition. : A systematic search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The search was guided by the question "How is IPF defined?" and was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The retrieved studies were reviewed and analyzed. The definitions of IPFs in the included studies were compiled into two sets of categories based on the description of and the specification of in defining IPFs. : The systematic literature search identified 4852 publications accessible for title-abstract screening, which yielded 395 studies for full-text assessment. Sixty-five studies met the eligibility criteria and were included. Sixty-two percent mentioned "FDG uptake" in their definition. In 40% of the definitions, "Focal FDG uptake" was specified, while "FDG uptake in the surrounding tissue" was included in 15%. Fifty-seven percent stated that IPFs were "Unrelated to PET/CT indication". Thirty-four percent specified IPFs as "Present in other organ than PET/CT indication", whereas 20% included "No known disease related to IPF". Seventeen percent of the definitions comprised a "New finding", while 15% and 11% encompassed a "Clinical asymptomatic patient" and "Not a metastasis", respectively. Finally, 5% of the definitions included "Potential clinical significance". : No generally accepted definition of IPFs currently exists. We propose an IPF definition based on explicit FDG uptake and clinical patient-related factors.
(1)系统回顾文献中目前使用的偶然发现的2-脱氧-2-[F]氟-D-葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描结果(IPF)的定义;(2)提出IPF的定义。根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目声明进行了系统检索。检索以“如何定义IPF?”这一问题为导向,在MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中进行。对检索到的研究进行了审查和分析。根据定义IPF时对[未提及具体内容1]的描述和[未提及具体内容2]的规范,将纳入研究中IPF的定义分为两组类别。系统文献检索确定了4852篇可用于标题-摘要筛选的出版物,从中产生了395项进行全文评估的研究。65项研究符合纳入标准并被纳入。62%的研究在其定义中提到了“FDG摄取”。在40%的定义中明确提到了“局灶性FDG摄取”,而15%的定义中包括了“周围组织中的FDG摄取”。57%的研究指出IPF“与PET/CT指征无关”。34%的研究将IPF定义为“出现在PET/CT指征以外的其他器官”,而20%的研究包括“与IPF无已知相关疾病”。17%的定义包含“新发现”,而分别有15%和11%的定义包含“临床无症状患者”和“不是转移灶”。最后,5%的定义包括“潜在临床意义”。目前尚无普遍接受的IPF定义。我们基于明确的FDG摄取和与临床患者相关的因素提出了一个IPF定义。