• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

忽视综合征中的视觉空间搜索与半视野中刺激数量的关系

Visual-Spatial Search in Neglect Syndrome as a Function of the Number of Stimuli in the Hemifields.

作者信息

Varako Nataliya, Kovyazina Maria, Yurina Daria, Propustina Victoria, Stepanov Georgiy, Vasilyeva Svetlana, Daminov Vadim, Skvortsov Anatoliy, Baulina Maria, Zinchenko Yuri

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 125009, Russia.

Research Center of Neurology, Moscow 125367, Russia.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 28;12(23):2387. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232387.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare12232387
PMID:39685009
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11640915/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neglect syndrome is a serious condition that often affects the ability to perform visual-spatial search tasks, interfering with the ability to detect stimuli on the left side of space. A number of factors can affect the success of visual search in patients with neglect syndrome, including visual field load. The purpose of this study is to investigate how the number of stimuli in the right visual hemifield influences the efficiency of visual search in the left (neglected) hemifield, hypothesizing that an increased object load on the right side may impair search performance on the left.

METHODS

The sample comprised 30 patients with neglect syndrome as the target group and 20 patients with right hemisphere damage but no signs of hemispatial neglect as the control group. This study employed several neuropsychological tests, including neuropsychological examination according to the scheme of A.R. Luria. The SPSS 23.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the data.

RESULTS

The Red Shapes test revealed a significant decrease in the number of stimuli detected in both the right and left visual hemifields across successive series ( < 0.001) in patients within the target group. No significant differences were observed in the participants of the control group. This study's results may be explained by the phenomenon of SSM (subsequent search misses) and the theory of attentional resource depletion during visual search tasks. These results indicate the need for further research into the features of visual search under various conditions, including the load and structuredness of the visual field.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that the number of elements in the right visual hemifield influences the ability to detect elements in the left hemifield in patients with left-sided neglect, as demonstrated using the Red Shapes test.

摘要

背景

忽视综合征是一种严重病症,常影响执行视觉空间搜索任务的能力,干扰检测空间左侧刺激的能力。多种因素会影响忽视综合征患者视觉搜索的成功率,包括视野负荷。本研究旨在探究右视野中刺激数量如何影响左(被忽视)视野的视觉搜索效率,假设右侧物体负荷增加可能损害左侧的搜索表现。

方法

样本包括30名患有忽视综合征的患者作为目标组,以及20名有右侧半球损伤但无半侧空间忽视迹象的患者作为对照组。本研究采用了多种神经心理学测试,包括按照A.R.卢里亚方案进行的神经心理学检查。使用SPSS 23.0软件对数据进行统计分析。

结果

红色形状测试显示,目标组患者在连续系列中,右视野和左视野检测到的刺激数量均显著减少(<0.001)。对照组参与者未观察到显著差异。本研究结果可能由后续搜索遗漏(SSM)现象和视觉搜索任务中的注意力资源耗竭理论来解释。这些结果表明需要进一步研究各种条件下视觉搜索的特征,包括视野的负荷和结构。

结论

本研究证实,如使用红色形状测试所示,右视野中的元素数量会影响左侧忽视患者检测左视野中元素的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdc5/11640915/49b861209347/healthcare-12-02387-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdc5/11640915/f56501fd3d3c/healthcare-12-02387-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdc5/11640915/b522f27ace2c/healthcare-12-02387-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdc5/11640915/1baa4fe6522b/healthcare-12-02387-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdc5/11640915/00254ce0b5f8/healthcare-12-02387-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdc5/11640915/2946681334d8/healthcare-12-02387-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdc5/11640915/823d96d313cf/healthcare-12-02387-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdc5/11640915/49b861209347/healthcare-12-02387-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdc5/11640915/f56501fd3d3c/healthcare-12-02387-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdc5/11640915/b522f27ace2c/healthcare-12-02387-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdc5/11640915/1baa4fe6522b/healthcare-12-02387-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdc5/11640915/00254ce0b5f8/healthcare-12-02387-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdc5/11640915/2946681334d8/healthcare-12-02387-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdc5/11640915/823d96d313cf/healthcare-12-02387-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdc5/11640915/49b861209347/healthcare-12-02387-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Visual-Spatial Search in Neglect Syndrome as a Function of the Number of Stimuli in the Hemifields.忽视综合征中的视觉空间搜索与半视野中刺激数量的关系
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 28;12(23):2387. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232387.
2
Dynamic spatial coding within the dorsal frontoparietal network during a visual search task.视觉搜索任务期间背侧额顶叶网络内的动态空间编码
PLoS One. 2008 Sep 9;3(9):e3167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003167.
3
A systematic study of visual extinction. Between- and within-field deficits of attention in hemispatial neglect.视觉消退的系统研究。半侧空间忽视中注意的场间和场内缺陷。
Brain. 2000 Jun;123 ( Pt 6):1263-79. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.6.1263.
4
Acute visual neglect and extinction: distinct functional state of the visuospatial attention system.急性视觉忽视和失认:视空间注意系统的不同功能状态。
Brain. 2011 Nov;134(Pt 11):3310-25. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr220. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
5
Impact of dynamic bottom-up features and top-down control on the visual exploration of moving real-world scenes in hemispatial neglect.动态自下而上特征和自上而下控制对视空间忽略症患者对移动真实场景视觉探索的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Aug;50(10):2415-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.012. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
6
Ipsilesional deficit of selective attention in left homonymous hemianopia and left unilateral spatial neglect.左侧同向性偏盲和左侧单侧空间忽略患者的选择性注意偏向健侧。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 May;128:305-314. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
7
Spatial analysis after perinatal stroke: patterns of neglect and exploration in extra-personal space.围生期卒中后的空间分析:人际空间忽视和探索的模式。
Brain Cogn. 2012 Jul;79(2):107-16. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
8
Competition between simultaneous stimuli modulated by location probability in hemispatial neglect.半侧空间忽视中由位置概率调制的同时刺激之间的竞争
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(7):1050-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.026. Epub 2005 Dec 5.
9
Gaze-contingent display technology can help to reduce the ipsilesional attention bias in hemispatial neglect following stroke.注视相关显示技术有助于减少脑卒中后偏侧空间忽略症的对侧注视偏向。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Nov 16;19(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01104-5.
10
Multi-tasking uncovers right spatial neglect and extinction in chronic left-hemisphere stroke patients.多任务揭示慢性左半球中风患者的右侧空间忽视和消退现象。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Nov;92:147-157. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.028. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Five Factors that Guide Attention in Visual Search.视觉搜索中引导注意力的五个因素。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Mar;1(3). doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0058. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
2
Overview of the Complex Figure Test and Its Clinical Application in Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Including Copying and Recall.复杂图形测试概述及其在神经精神疾病中的临床应用,包括临摹和回忆。
Front Neurol. 2021 Aug 31;12:680474. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.680474. eCollection 2021.
3
Distorted gaze direction input to attentional priority map in spatial neglect.空间忽视中注意力优先映射的扭曲注视方向输入。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Aug;131:119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 May 23.
4
Direct Gaze Partially Overcomes Hemispatial Neglect and Captures Spatial Attention.直视部分克服半侧空间忽视并吸引空间注意力。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 15;9:2702. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02702. eCollection 2018.
5
Spatial attention systems in spatial neglect.空间忽视中的空间注意系统。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Aug;75:61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.019. Epub 2015 May 22.
6
Self-induced attentional blink: a cause of errors in multiple-target search.自我诱导的注意瞬脱:多目标搜索中出现错误的一个原因。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Dec;24(12):2569-74. doi: 10.1177/0956797613497970. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
7
Predicting functional outcome after stroke: the influence of neglect on basic activities in daily living.预测卒中后的功能结局:忽视对日常生活基本活动的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 May 9;7:182. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00182. eCollection 2013.
8
Memory for found targets interferes with subsequent performance in multiple-target visual search.记忆已发现目标会干扰多目标视觉搜索中的后续表现。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Oct;39(5):1398-408. doi: 10.1037/a0030726. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
9
Visual extinction in relation to visuospatial neglect after right-hemispheric stroke: quantitative assessment and statistical lesion-symptom mapping.右侧半球卒中后视觉消失与视觉空间忽视的关系:定量评估和统计病变-症状映射。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;82(8):862-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.224261. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
10
Anatomy of spatial attention: insights from perfusion imaging and hemispatial neglect in acute stroke.空间注意力的解剖学:急性卒中灌注成像和半侧空间忽视的启示
J Neurosci. 2005 Mar 23;25(12):3161-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4468-04.2005.