Lee Hyung Rae, Cho Jae Hwan, Seok Sang Yun, Kim San, Cho Dae Wi, Yang Jae Hyuk
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University Medical Center, Anam Hospital, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 21;13(23):7017. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237017.
This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with mechanical failure in patients undergoing spinal instrumentation without fusion for metastatic spinal tumors. We retrospectively evaluated data from 220 patients with spinal tumors who underwent instrumentation without fusion. Propensity scores were used to match preoperative variables, resulting in the inclusion of 24 patients in the failure group (F group) and 72 in the non-failure group (non-F group). Demographic, surgical, and radiological characteristics were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were conducted to identify predictors of mechanical failure. Propensity score matching resulted in a balanced distribution of covariates. Lower Hounsfield unit (HU) values at the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) were the only independent predictor of implant failure ( = 0.037). A cutoff value of 127.273 HUs was determined to predict mechanical failure, with a sensitivity of 59.1%, specificity of 73.4%, and area under the curve of 0.655 (95% confidence interval: 0.49-0.79). A significant difference in survival was observed between the groups with HU values above and below the cutoff ( = 0.0057). Cement-augmented screws were underutilized, with an average of only 0.2 screws per patient in the F group. Preoperative LIV HU values < 127.273 were strongly associated with an increased risk of mechanical failure following spinal instrumentation without fusion. Alternative surgical strategies including the use of cement-augmented screws are recommended for patients with low HU values.
本研究旨在确定转移性脊柱肿瘤患者在接受非融合性脊柱内固定手术时与器械故障相关的危险因素。我们回顾性评估了220例接受非融合性内固定手术的脊柱肿瘤患者的数据。采用倾向评分法匹配术前变量,最终将24例患者纳入失败组(F组),72例纳入非失败组(非F组)。比较了两组患者的人口统计学、手术和影像学特征。进行逻辑回归和Kaplan-Meier生存分析以确定器械故障的预测因素。倾向评分匹配使协变量分布均衡。最低固定椎体(LIV)处较低的Hounsfield单位(HU)值是植入物失败的唯一独立预测因素(P = 0.037)。确定预测器械故障的临界值为127.273 HU,敏感性为59.1%,特异性为73.4%,曲线下面积为0.655(95%置信区间:0.49 - 0.79)。HU值高于和低于临界值的两组患者生存率存在显著差异(P = 0.0057)。骨水泥强化螺钉使用不足,F组患者平均每人仅使用0.2枚螺钉。术前LIV的HU值<127.273与非融合性脊柱内固定术后器械故障风险增加密切相关。对于HU值较低的患者,建议采用包括使用骨水泥强化螺钉在内的替代手术策略。