Sijgers Leanne, Geys Marlies, Geissler Gunnar, Boyle Patrick, Huber Alexander, Pfiffner Flurin
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
European Research Center, Advanced Bionics GmbH, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Nov 27;24(23):7570. doi: 10.3390/s24237570.
This study examined electrical bioimpedance as a biomarker for intracochlear tissue changes after cochlear implant surgery, comparing monopolar, three-point, and four-point impedance measurements over time and evaluating different measurement systems and approaches.
Impedance measurements were obtained from 21 participants during surgery and at four postoperative stages. Monopolar impedances were recorded using the Bionic Ear Data Collection System (BEDCS) and the Active Insertion Monitoring (AIM) system. Three- and four-point impedances were recorded directly using BEDCS, and indirect three-point impedances were additionally derived from Electrical Field Imaging matrices recorded using BEDCS or AIM.
There was an 11% relative error between monopolar measurements from BEDCS and AIM and a 25% discrepancy between direct and indirect three-point measurements. Despite this, direct and indirect measurements from both systems were useful for tracking postoperative impedance shifts. Three- and four-point measurements showed a strong relationship both during and after surgery. Our results suggest that three- and four-point measurements are more specific than monopolar impedances in capturing localized tissue changes.
Three- and four-point impedance measurements are potential markers of intracochlear tissue changes over time. While direct three-point impedance measurements offer higher accuracy, indirect measurements provide a feasible alternative for monitoring intracochlear changes in clinical settings lacking the option of direct measurements.
本研究将电生物阻抗作为人工耳蜗植入术后耳蜗内组织变化的生物标志物,比较单极、三点和四点阻抗测量随时间的变化,并评估不同的测量系统和方法。
在手术期间及术后四个阶段对21名参与者进行阻抗测量。使用仿生耳数据收集系统(BEDCS)和主动插入监测(AIM)系统记录单极阻抗。直接使用BEDCS记录三点和四点阻抗,另外还从使用BEDCS或AIM记录的电场成像矩阵中得出间接三点阻抗。
BEDCS和AIM的单极测量之间存在11%的相对误差,直接和间接三点测量之间存在25%的差异。尽管如此,两个系统的直接和间接测量对于追踪术后阻抗变化都是有用的。三点和四点测量在手术期间和术后都显示出很强的相关性。我们的结果表明,在捕捉局部组织变化方面,三点和四点测量比单极阻抗更具特异性。
三点和四点阻抗测量是耳蜗内组织随时间变化的潜在标志物。虽然直接三点阻抗测量提供了更高的准确性,但在缺乏直接测量选项的临床环境中,间接测量为监测耳蜗内变化提供了一种可行的替代方法。