Suppr超能文献

帕博利珠单抗单药或联合化疗与化疗治疗转移性癌症的比较:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。

Pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

作者信息

Yue Yumin, Wang Quan, Wei Mingtian, Ding Fanghui, Li Jiang, Zheng Bobo

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China.

Ambulatory Surgery Center of Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 13;103(50):e40826. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040826.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether pembrolizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy is superior to chemotherapy in metastatic cancer remains controversial. The study aims to give the effectiveness and safety of pembrolizumab-related interventions compared to chemotherapy in metastatic cancer.

METHODS

Electronic databases were systematically searched until November 20, 2023, for all randomized controlled trials comparing Pembrolizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for metastatic cancer. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for OS, PFS, overall response rate, and overall adverse events (AEs) by random effects models.

RESULTS

16 Randomized controlled trials with 9148 patients were included. Compared with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab was associated with longer OS (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.73-0.91, P = .0004), more immune-mediated AEs, fewer overall AEs, and grade 3 or 4 AEs, however, no significant difference was found in PFS, overall response rate, and events leading to death. Pembrolizumab with chemotherapy was associated with longer OS (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.61-0.90, P = .002) and PFS (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.50-0.79, P < .0001), higher overall response rate, and more immune-mediated AEs comparing to chemotherapy alone, however, no significant advantages were observed in disease control rates, overall AEs, grade 3 or 4 AEs and events leading to death. The patients with programmed cell death ligand 1 tumor proportion scores of at least 50% or combined positive scores (CPS) of at least 10 could derive significantly better OS and PFS benefits from pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy. Similar OS results were found for first-line treatment and lung cancer subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy indicates an effective and safe treatment for metastatic cancer. Pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy provides a better survival advantage under first-line treatment or programmed cell death ligand 1 combined positive scores of at least 10 or programmed cell death ligand 1 tumor proportion scores of at least 50%. However, we found that the specific efficacy of pembrolizumab in unused tumor types could not be effectively evaluated.

摘要

背景

帕博利珠单抗单药治疗或联合化疗在转移性癌症中是否优于化疗仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较帕博利珠单抗相关干预措施与化疗在转移性癌症中的有效性和安全性。

方法

系统检索电子数据库至2023年11月20日,纳入所有比较帕博利珠单抗单药或联合化疗与化疗治疗转移性癌症的随机对照试验。主要结局为总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。采用随机效应模型计算OS、PFS、总缓解率和总不良事件(AE)的风险比(HR)及95%置信区间(CI)的比值比。

结果

纳入16项随机对照试验,共9148例患者。与化疗相比,帕博利珠单抗与更长的OS相关(HR 0.82;95%CI 0.73 - 0.91,P = 0.0004),免疫介导的AE更多,总AE、3级或4级AE更少;然而,在PFS、总缓解率和导致死亡的事件方面未发现显著差异。与单纯化疗相比,帕博利珠单抗联合化疗与更长的OS(HR 0.74;95%CI 0.61 - 0.90,P = 0.002)和PFS(HR 0.63;95%CI 0.50 - 0.79,P < 0.0001)、更高的总缓解率及更多的免疫介导的AE相关;然而,在疾病控制率、总AE、3级或4级AE以及导致死亡的事件方面未观察到显著优势。程序性死亡配体1肿瘤比例评分至少为50%或联合阳性评分(CPS)至少为10的患者,单独使用帕博利珠单抗或联合化疗可获得显著更好的OS和PFS获益。一线治疗和肺癌亚组分析得到了相似的OS结果。

结论

帕博利珠单抗单药或联合化疗对转移性癌症是一种有效且安全的治疗方法。在一线治疗或程序性死亡配体1联合阳性评分至少为10或程序性死亡配体1肿瘤比例评分至少为50%的情况下,帕博利珠单抗单药或联合化疗具有更好的生存优势。然而,我们发现帕博利珠单抗在未使用的肿瘤类型中的具体疗效无法得到有效评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c348/11651430/87630eb9688c/medi-103-e40826-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验