Sevinc Ceyda, Gürler Volkan, Harput Gulcan, Ocguder Ali, Ergen F Bilge, Tunay Volga Bayrakcı
Department of Sports Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Sep;33(9):3088-3097. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12553. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
Recently, blood flow restriction (BFR) and cross education (CE) trainings are the options for quadriceps strength recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of CE combined with BFR on quadriceps strength and thickness after ACLR.
Twenty-four male patients [(Age: 24.9 ± 6.3 years, body mass index: 24 ± 2.3 kg/m) who had undergone ACLR with hamstring autograft were included. At 4 weeks after surgery, the patients were randomly divided into two groups (Group-1: CE + BFR, n = 13, Group-2: CE, n = 11). All patients had standardized rehabilitation for their reconstructed limb until 12 weeks postsurgery, and they all received CE training for uninjured limb at isokinetic system (quadriceps eccentric contraction, 60°/s 3-set 12-rep, 2-days in a week) during 8 weeks. Group 2 performed the same CE procedure with BFR. Quadriceps isometric strength was measured using an isokinetic dynamometer, while the thickness of quadriceps (rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis obliquus) and cross-sectional area of rectus femoris were evaluated using ultrasound pretraining (4th-week postsurgery) and posttraining (12th-week postsurgery). Analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis.
Group-by-time interaction and the group main effect were not significant for any measured variables in both limbs (p > 0.05). There was a significant main effect of time observed for quadriceps strength and thickness in involved and uninvolved limbs (p < 0.001, p < 0.05, respectively). In Group 1, the limb symmetry index for quadriceps strength increased from 49.3% to 71.7%, while in Group 2, it increased from 50.9% to 75.2%.
BFR training, adapted to CE eccentric strengthening, may not be effective for quadriceps muscle strength recovery after ACLR. Further investigations with varied training protocols are needed to research the impact of BFR on CE.
Level II randomized controlled trial.
最近,血流限制(BFR)训练和交叉教育(CE)训练是前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后股四头肌力量恢复的可选方法。本研究的目的是探讨CE联合BFR对ACLR后股四头肌力量和厚度的影响。
纳入24例接受自体腘绳肌腱ACLR的男性患者[年龄:24.9±6.3岁,体重指数:24±2.3kg/m²]。术后4周,将患者随机分为两组(第1组:CE+BFR,n=13;第2组:CE,n=11)。所有患者对其重建肢体进行标准化康复直至术后12周,并且在8周内,他们都在等速系统上对未受伤肢体进行CE训练(股四头肌离心收缩,60°/秒,3组,每组12次重复,每周2天)。第2组进行相同的CE训练但不进行BFR训练。使用等速测力计测量股四头肌等长力量,而在训练前(术后第4周)和训练后(术后第12周)使用超声评估股四头肌(股直肌、股外侧肌、股内侧斜肌)的厚度以及股直肌的横截面积。采用方差分析进行统计分析。
两组患者在两个时间点的交互作用和组间主效应在任何测量变量上均无统计学意义(p>0.05)。在患侧和健侧肢体中,观察到股四头肌力量和厚度随时间有显著的主效应(分别为p<0.001,p<0.05)。在第1组中,股四头肌力量的肢体对称指数从49.3%增加到71.7%,而在第2组中,从50.9%增加到75.2%。
适应CE离心强化训练的BFR训练可能对ACLR后股四头肌力量恢复无效。需要采用不同训练方案进行进一步研究,以探讨BFR对CE的影响。
II级随机对照试验。