Stell David, Kwong Dr Man Ting, Megwa Robert, Bashford Dr Tom, Akinluyi Dr Emmanuel, Clarkson Prof P John
Engineering Design Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom.
Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
IPEM Transl. 2024 Dec;12:None. doi: 10.1016/j.ipemt.2024.100031.
Acute healthcare providers operate large, diverse medical equipment inventories. Resources for managing these inventories is frequently scarce so must be prioritised such that maximum benefit is conferred per unit of expenditure. This review identifies publications which have discussed the clinical value conferred by mechanical ventilation (MV) and by extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Respectively, mechanical ventilators and ECMO units are necessary to deliver these therapies. Systematic searches for publications which discuss the clinical value conferred by MV and by ECMO were conducted. The identified articles included reviews, prospective studies, retrospective studies, and models. Most presented findings in terms of the cost-effectiveness ratio. The patient populations studied, and analytical methods used varied widely. The clinical value conferred by MV varied with dependencies on several factors including the age- and disease- profile of the patient population. It was not possible to infer these dependencies from the literature which exists for ECMO. More relevant literature existed for MV, the more mature technology, than did for ECMO. The ECMO literature also tended to be more recent and included more modelling studies and fewer prospective studies. The data extracted could inform estimates of the clinical value likely to be delivered by mechanical ventilators operated by a specific institution. Estimates for ECMO are likely to carry greater uncertainty than those for MV.
急性医疗服务提供者管理着大量、多样的医疗设备库存。管理这些库存的资源往往稀缺,因此必须进行优先级排序,以便每单位支出能带来最大效益。本综述确定了讨论机械通气(MV)和体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)临床价值的出版物。分别而言,机械通气机和ECMO设备是实施这些治疗所必需的。我们对讨论MV和ECMO临床价值的出版物进行了系统检索。所确定的文章包括综述、前瞻性研究、回顾性研究和模型。大多数文章以成本效益比的形式呈现研究结果。所研究的患者群体和所使用的分析方法差异很大。MV的临床价值因多种因素而异,包括患者群体的年龄和疾病特征。从现有的ECMO文献中无法推断出这些相关性。与ECMO相比,关于更成熟技术MV的相关文献更多。ECMO的文献也往往更新,包括更多的模型研究和更少的前瞻性研究。提取的数据可为特定机构操作的机械通气机可能提供的临床价值估计提供参考。与MV相比,ECMO的估计可能存在更大的不确定性。