Op 't Hoog Catharina J P, Bosman Sabien J E, Boerrigter Emmy, Mehra Niven, van Oort Inge M, van Erp Nielka P, Kievit Wietske
Department of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
IQ Health, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Dec 15;16:17588359241305084. doi: 10.1177/17588359241305084. eCollection 2024.
The androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI), abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide, are commonly used in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, early resistance to ARPI treatment occurs frequently. Traditionally, the response is evaluated 3-6 months after the start of treatment. However, recent findings indicate that by detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at baseline and 4 weeks after ARPI treatment initiation, patients with a nondurable response can be identified after 4 weeks of treatment, enabling an early switch to alternative treatments.
This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ctDNA-guided treatment switch after 4 weeks of ARPI therapy in mCRPC patients compared to standard of care.
A cost-effectiveness analysis.
A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted by creating a Markov state transition model to simulate progression, mortality, and treatment costs over a 5-year time horizon comparing ctDNA-guided care versus standard of care. The outcomes measured were incremental treatment costs per life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained.
The analysis showed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €65,400.86 per QALY gained and an incremental net monetary benefit of €2716.62. Thereby, the use of ctDNA-guided treatment was cost-effective in comparison to standard care in 74% of the simulations using a willingness-to-pay threshold of €80,000 per QALY gained.
Our study demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of using a ctDNA-guided early therapy switch in non-responders after only 4 weeks of first-line ARPI therapy in mCRPC patients. This paves the way for implementing ctDNA-guided treatment decisions in clinical practice.
雄激素受体通路抑制剂(ARPI),醋酸阿比特龙和恩杂鲁胺,常用于转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者的一线治疗。然而,ARPI治疗的早期耐药经常发生。传统上,在治疗开始后3至6个月评估疗效。然而,最近的研究结果表明,通过在基线和ARPI治疗开始后4周检测循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA),可以在治疗4周后识别出反应不持久的患者,从而能够早期改用其他治疗方法。
本研究旨在评估与标准治疗相比,在mCRPC患者中ARPI治疗4周后ctDNA指导的治疗转换的成本效益。
成本效益分析。
通过创建马尔可夫状态转换模型进行成本效益分析,以模拟在5年时间范围内比较ctDNA指导的治疗与标准治疗的疾病进展、死亡率和治疗成本。测量的结果是每获得的生命年和质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量治疗成本。
分析显示每获得一个QALY的增量成本效益比为65,400.86欧元,增量净货币效益为2,716.62欧元。因此,在使用每获得一个QALY支付意愿阈值为80,000欧元的74%的模拟中,与标准治疗相比,使用ctDNA指导的治疗具有成本效益。
我们的研究证明了在mCRPC患者一线ARPI治疗仅4周后,对无反应者使用ctDNA指导的早期治疗转换具有成本效益。这为在临床实践中实施ctDNA指导的治疗决策铺平了道路。