Suppr超能文献

卡巴他赛对比阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺用于预后不良的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌:一项多中心、随机、开放性、二期临床试验。

Cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in poor prognosis metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial.

机构信息

Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland.

Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada; Oncology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2021 Jul;32(7):896-905. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.205. Epub 2021 Apr 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment of poor prognosis metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) includes taxane chemotherapy and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI). We sought to determine optimal treatment in this setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial recruited patients with ARPI-naive mCRPC and poor prognosis features (presence of liver metastases, progression to mCRPC after <12 months of androgen deprivation therapy, or ≥4 of 6 clinical criteria). Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive cabazitaxel plus prednisone (group A) or physician's choice of enzalutamide or abiraterone plus prednisone (group B) at standard doses. Patients could cross over at progression. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate for first-line treatment (defined as prostate-specific antigen response ≥50%, radiographic response, or stable disease ≥12 weeks).

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were accrued (median follow-up 21.9 months). First-line clinical benefit rate was greater in group A versus group B (80% versus 62%, P = 0.039). Overall survival was not different between groups A and B (median 37.0 versus 15.5 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.58, P = 0.073) nor was time to progression (median 5.3 versus 2.8 months, HR = 0.87, P = 0.52). The most common first-line treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (cabazitaxel 32% versus ARPI 0%), diarrhoea (9% versus 0%), infection (9% versus 0%), and fatigue (7% versus 5%). Baseline circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) fraction above the cohort median and on-treatment ctDNA increase were associated with shorter time to progression (HR = 2.38, P < 0.001; HR = 4.03, P < 0.001). Patients with >30% ctDNA fraction at baseline had markedly shorter overall survival than those with undetectable ctDNA (HR = 38.22, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Cabazitaxel was associated with a higher clinical benefit rate in patients with ARPI-naive poor prognosis mCRPC. ctDNA abundance was prognostic independent of clinical features, and holds promise as a stratification biomarker.

摘要

背景

治疗预后不良的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)包括紫杉烷化疗和雄激素受体通路抑制剂(ARPI)。我们旨在确定这种情况下的最佳治疗方法。

患者和方法

这项多中心、随机、开放标签、二期试验招募了 ARPI 初治且预后不良特征(存在肝转移、雄激素剥夺治疗后<12 个月进展为 mCRPC、或 6 项临床标准中有≥4 项)的 mCRPC 患者。患者按 1:1 随机分配接受卡巴他赛加泼尼松(A 组)或医生选择的恩扎卢胺或阿比特龙加泼尼松(B 组)标准剂量治疗。患者可在进展时交叉。主要终点是一线治疗的临床获益率(定义为前列腺特异性抗原反应≥50%、影像学反应或稳定疾病≥12 周)。

结果

共纳入 95 例患者(中位随访 21.9 个月)。A 组的一线临床获益率高于 B 组(80%对 62%,P=0.039)。A 组和 B 组的总生存期无差异(中位 37.0 对 15.5 个月,风险比(HR)=0.58,P=0.073),无进展生存期也无差异(中位 5.3 对 2.8 个月,HR=0.87,P=0.52)。最常见的一线治疗相关≥3 级不良事件为中性粒细胞减少(卡巴他赛 32%对 ARPI 0%)、腹泻(9%对 0%)、感染(9%对 0%)和疲劳(7%对 5%)。基线循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)分数高于队列中位数和治疗期间 ctDNA 增加与较短的无进展生存期相关(HR=2.38,P<0.001;HR=4.03,P<0.001)。基线时 ctDNA 分数>30%的患者总生存期明显短于 ctDNA 未检出的患者(HR=38.22,P<0.001)。

结论

卡巴他赛在 ARPI 初治且预后不良的 mCRPC 患者中与更高的临床获益率相关。ctDNA 丰度独立于临床特征具有预后意义,有望成为一种分层生物标志物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验