• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙语和英语单词识别测试对确定人工耳蜗植入候选者的分类性能。

Classification performance of Spanish and English word recognition testing to identify cochlear implant candidates.

作者信息

Velandia Sandra L, Prentiss Sandra M, Martinez Diane M, Sanchez Chrisanda M, Laffitte-Lopez Denise, Snapp Hillary A

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2024 Dec 17:1-7. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2024.2427854.

DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2427854
PMID:39688264
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effects of language on word recognition ability and associated access to cochlear implants in Spanish- and English-speakers with hearing loss.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

STUDY SAMPLE

The study included 1411 English and Spanish-speaking adults with sensorineural hearing loss. Word recognition as a function of pure-tone average was evaluated by test language. Sensitivity and specificity of word recognition testing performed using the NU-6 and Spanish Bisyllables in discriminating between cochlear implant and non-cochlear implant candidates were analysed.

RESULTS

Spanish-speakers had significantly poorer thresholds compared to English-speakers, yet significantly better word recognition, t(2763) = 1.86 < 0.05. The effect of test language on word recognition increased with increasing hearing loss severity, F(3,2762) = 6.03, < 0.001, partial η = .007. The sensitivity and specificity of word recognition testing were 93% and 74% respectively for Spanish, and 95% and 75%, respectively, for English word recognition tests in meeting referral criteria for cochlear implant evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on classification performance analysis, Spanish and English word recognition measures exhibit comparable effectiveness in referring patients for cochlear implant evaluation. While Spanish-language measures yielded better performance, this does not result in a significant difference in referral rates for Spanish versus English speakers for unaided word recognition scores of 60% or less.

摘要

目的

探讨语言对西班牙裔和英裔听力损失患者单词识别能力以及人工耳蜗植入相关情况的影响。

设计

回顾性病历审查。

研究样本

该研究纳入了1411名讲英语和西班牙语的感音神经性听力损失成人。根据测试语言评估单词识别作为纯音平均听阈函数的情况。分析了使用NU - 6和西班牙语双音节词进行的单词识别测试在区分人工耳蜗植入候选者和非候选者方面的敏感性和特异性。

结果

与讲英语者相比,讲西班牙语者的听阈明显更差,但单词识别能力明显更好,t(2763) = 1.86,P < 0.05。测试语言对单词识别的影响随着听力损失严重程度的增加而增大,F(3,2762) = 6.03,P < 0.001,偏η² = 0.007。在满足人工耳蜗植入评估转诊标准方面,西班牙语单词识别测试的敏感性和特异性分别为93%和74%,英语单词识别测试分别为95%和75%。

结论

基于分类性能分析,西班牙语和英语单词识别测量在转诊患者进行人工耳蜗植入评估方面表现出相当的有效性。虽然西班牙语测量表现更好,但对于单词识别分数在60%及以下的讲西班牙语者和讲英语者,转诊率并没有显著差异。

相似文献

1
Classification performance of Spanish and English word recognition testing to identify cochlear implant candidates.西班牙语和英语单词识别测试对确定人工耳蜗植入候选者的分类性能。
Int J Audiol. 2024 Dec 17:1-7. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2024.2427854.
2
Cochlear Implant Referral Criteria for the Spanish-Speaking Adult Population.西班牙语成年人群的人工耳蜗植入推荐标准。
Otol Neurotol. 2024 Feb 1;45(2):e71-e77. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004065. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
3
Speech Discrimination Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients by Primary Language and Bilingual Hispanic Patients.成人人工耳蜗植入者的主要语言和双语西班牙语患者的言语辨别结果。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jan;170(1):204-211. doi: 10.1002/ohn.485. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
4
Utilization of the Spanish Bisyllable Word Recognition Test to Assess Cochlear Implant Performance Trajectory.利用西班牙双音节词识别测试评估人工耳蜗植入性能轨迹。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 24;14(3):774. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030774.
5
Language-specific, hearing-related changes in vowel spaces: a preliminary study of English- and Spanish-speaking cochlear implant users.特定语言的、与听力相关的元音空间变化:对英语和西班牙语使用者人工耳蜗植入者的初步研究
Ear Hear. 2001 Dec;22(6):461-70. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200112000-00003.
6
Phoneme Error Pattern by Heritage Speakers of Spanish on an English Word Recognition Test.西班牙语母语者在英语单词识别测试中的音素错误模式。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Apr;28(4):352-365. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16094.
7
Can routine office-based audiometry predict cochlear implant evaluation results?基于办公室的常规听力测定能否预测人工耳蜗植入评估结果?
Laryngoscope. 2017 Jan;127(1):216-222. doi: 10.1002/lary.26066. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
8
Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.成人使用助听器仅获得边际效益时的人工耳蜗植入:一项欧洲研究。
Am J Otol. 1998 Sep;19(5):591-7.
9
Cantonese Tone Perception for Children Who Use a Hearing Aid and a Cochlear Implant in Opposite Ears.使用助听器和人工耳蜗的儿童的粤语声调感知。
Ear Hear. 2017 Nov/Dec;38(6):e359-e368. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000453.
10
Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing).成年人工耳蜗植入者在未植入耳佩戴数字助听器时对语音的识别和定位(双耳双模听力)
J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Jun;20(6):353-73. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.20.6.4.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilization of the Spanish Bisyllable Word Recognition Test to Assess Cochlear Implant Performance Trajectory.利用西班牙双音节词识别测试评估人工耳蜗植入性能轨迹。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 24;14(3):774. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030774.