Li Ningcheng, Kim Junman, Patel Anshul M, Markham David W, Tompkins Christine M, Rahban Youssef, Stokken Glenn, Gottbrecht Matthew, Prologo Frank J, Resnick Neil J
From the Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology (N.L., N.J.R.), Department of Medicine, Division of Interventional Cardiology (Y.R.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (Y.R., G.S., M.G.), UMass Memorial Medical Center and Chan Medical School, 55 Lake Ave N, S2-817A, Worcester, MA 01655; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (J.K.); Division of Cardiology, Division of Electrophysiology, Emory Heart & Vascular Center at Saint Joseph's Hospital, Atlanta, Ga (A.M.P., C.M.T.); Department of Heart Failure/Transplant Cardiology, Piedmont Heart Institute, Piedmont Healthcare, Atlanta, Ga (D.W.M.); and Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga (F.J.P.).
Radiology. 2024 Dec;313(3):e240587. doi: 10.1148/radiol.240587.
Background Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), including ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, present substantial therapeutic challenges due to their high morbidity, mortality, and increasing prevalence. Current treatments often prove infeasible or inadequate in patients with refractory VAs. Purpose To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of CT-guided left stellate ganglion cryoneurolysis (SGC) in the treatment of refractory VAs. Materials and Methods This retrospective study reviewed all consecutive patients with refractory VAs who underwent SGC between June 2020 and December 2023 at two tertiary care centers. Patients with refractory VAs who underwent CT-guided left SGC were included. No patients were excluded. Data on preprocedural clinical status, procedural approach, procedural outcomes, and adverse events were analyzed. The pre- and postprocedural number of defibrillations were compared using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Results A total of 17 patients (mean age, 60.4 years ± 2.7 [standard error of the mean]; 14 male) were included; seven patients (41%) were receiving β-adrenergic blocking agents. The mean number of antiarrhythmic medications per patient was 2.2 ± 0.2. CT-guided left SGC led to a significant reduction in defibrillations, from a median of 3 (IQR, 3-15) to 0 (IRQ, 0-0) in the 24 hours before and after the procedure, respectively ( < .001). Clinical success, defined as freedom from defibrillation within the preceding 24-hour period, was achieved in 14 of 17 patients (82%) 24 hours after and 15 of 17 patients (88%) 72 hours after the procedure. Of 17 patients, 12 (71%) proceeded to additional procedural management after SGC. At a mean follow-up of 469.2 days ± 90.8, 14 of 17 patients (82%) were alive. No moderate or high-grade adverse events were observed; mild adverse events included left upper extremity neurapraxia ( = 1) and transient Horner syndrome ( = 3). Conclusion CT-guided left SGC demonstrated promising effectiveness and safety in treating patients with refractory VAs. Thus, SGC warrants consideration for inclusion in a multidisciplinary treatment algorithm for VAs. © RSNA, 2024 See also the editorial by Cadour and Scemama in this issue.
背景 室性心律失常(VAs),包括室性心动过速和室颤,因其高发病率、高死亡率及患病率不断上升,带来了巨大的治疗挑战。对于难治性室性心律失常患者,目前的治疗方法往往不可行或效果不佳。目的 评估CT引导下左侧星状神经节冷冻消融术(SGC)治疗难治性室性心律失常的安全性和有效性。材料与方法 这项回顾性研究纳入了2020年6月至2023年12月期间在两家三级医疗中心接受SGC治疗的所有连续性难治性室性心律失常患者。纳入接受CT引导下左侧SGC治疗的难治性室性心律失常患者,无患者被排除。分析术前临床状况、手术方法、手术结果及不良事件的数据。使用Wilcoxon配对符号秩和检验比较术前和术后的除颤次数。结果 共纳入17例患者(平均年龄60.4岁±2.7[平均标准误];14例男性);7例患者(41%)正在接受β肾上腺素能阻滞剂治疗。每位患者抗心律失常药物的平均数量为2.2±0.2。CT引导下左侧SGC导致除颤次数显著减少,术前24小时内除颤次数中位数为3次(四分位间距,3 - 15),术后分别降至0次(四分位间距,0 - 0)(P <.001)。临床成功定义为在之前24小时内无除颤,术后24小时17例患者中有14例(82%)达到,术后72小时17例患者中有15例(88%)达到。17例患者中,12例(71%)在SGC后进行了额外的手术处理。平均随访469.2天±90.8天,17例患者中有14例(82%)存活。未观察到中度或高度不良事件;轻度不良事件包括左上肢神经失用(n = 1)和短暂性霍纳综合征(n = 3)。结论 CT引导下左侧SGC在治疗难治性室性心律失常患者中显示出有前景的有效性和安全性。因此,SGC值得考虑纳入室性心律失常的多学科治疗方案。©RSNA,2024 另见本期Cadour和Scemama的社论。