• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机性作为社会群体中不活动的驱动因素。

Randomness as a driver of inactivity in social groups.

作者信息

Bernadou Abel, Jeanson Raphaël

机构信息

Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, France.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Dec 17;20(12):e1012668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012668. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012668
PMID:39689059
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11651616/
Abstract

Social insects, such as ants and bees, are known for their highly efficient and structured colonies. Division of labour, in which each member of the colony has a specific role, is considered to be one major driver of their ecological success. However, empirical evidence has accumulated showing that many workers, sometimes more than half, remain idle in insect societies. Several hypotheses have been put forward to explain these patterns, but none provides a consensual explanation. Task specialisation exploits inter-individual variations, which are mainly influenced by genetic factors beyond the control of the colony. As a result, individuals may also differ in the efficiency with which they perform tasks. In this context, we aimed to test the hypothesis that colonies generate a large number of individuals in order to recruit only the most efficient to perform tasks, at the cost of producing and maintaining a fraction of workers that remain inactive. We developed a model to explore the conditions under which variations in the scaling of workers' production and maintenance costs, along with activity costs, allow colonies to sustain a fraction of inactive workers. We sampled individual performances according to different random distributions in order to simulate the variability associated with worker efficiency. Our results show that the inactivity of part of the workforce can be beneficial for a wide range of parameters if it allows colonies to select the most efficient workers. In decentralised systems such as insect societies, we suggest that inactivity is a by-product of the random processes associated with the generation of individuals whose performance levels cannot be controlled.

摘要

社会性昆虫,如蚂蚁和蜜蜂,以其高效且结构化的群体而闻名。分工,即群体中的每个成员都有特定的角色,被认为是它们在生态上取得成功的一个主要驱动力。然而,越来越多的实证证据表明,在昆虫社会中,许多工蚁,有时超过一半,会处于闲置状态。已经提出了几种假说来解释这些模式,但没有一个能提供一个共识性的解释。任务专业化利用个体间的差异,这些差异主要受群体无法控制的遗传因素影响。因此,个体在执行任务的效率上也可能存在差异。在这种背景下,我们旨在检验这样一个假说:群体产生大量个体,目的是只招募最有效率的个体来执行任务,而代价是产生并维持一部分不活动的工蚁。我们开发了一个模型,以探索在何种条件下,工蚁生产和维持成本的缩放变化,以及活动成本,能使群体维持一部分不活动的工蚁。我们根据不同的随机分布对个体表现进行采样,以模拟与工蚁效率相关的变异性。我们的结果表明,如果一部分劳动力的不活动状态能让群体选择最有效率的工蚁,那么对于广泛的参数范围来说,这种不活动状态可能是有益的。在像昆虫社会这样的分散系统中,我们认为不活动状态是与个体产生相关的随机过程的一个副产品,而这些个体的表现水平是无法控制的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e30/11651616/d81ee964bc6f/pcbi.1012668.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e30/11651616/d81ee964bc6f/pcbi.1012668.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e30/11651616/d81ee964bc6f/pcbi.1012668.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Randomness as a driver of inactivity in social groups.随机性作为社会群体中不活动的驱动因素。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Dec 17;20(12):e1012668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012668. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Explaining workers' inactivity in social colonies from first principles.从基本原则上解释社会群体中工人的不活跃性。
J R Soc Interface. 2023 Jan;20(198):20220808. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0808. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
3
Who Are the "Lazy" Ants? The Function of Inactivity in Social Insects and a Possible Role of Constraint: Inactive Ants Are Corpulent and May Be Young and/or Selfish.谁是“懒”蚂蚁?社会性昆虫中不活动的功能及限制的可能作用:不活动的蚂蚁体型肥胖,可能年幼且/或自私。
Integr Comp Biol. 2017 Sep 1;57(3):649-667. doi: 10.1093/icb/icx029.
4
Biomarkers in a socially exchanged /fluid reflect colony maturity, behavior, and distributed metabolism.生物标志物在社会交换/流动的环境中反映着群体的成熟度、行为和分布式代谢。
Elife. 2021 Nov 2;10:e74005. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74005.
5
Mechanisms of social regulation change across colony development in an ant.蚂蚁的社会调节机制在蚁群发展过程中发生变化。
BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Oct 27;10:328. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-328.
6
Costs of task allocation with local feedback: Effects of colony size and extra workers in social insects and other multi-agent systems.具有局部反馈的任务分配成本:蚁群规模和额外工蚁对社会性昆虫及其他多智能体系统的影响
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Dec 14;13(12):e1005904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005904. eCollection 2017 Dec.
7
Conflict over male parentage in social insects.社会性昆虫中关于父系的冲突。
PLoS Biol. 2004 Sep;2(9):E248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020248. Epub 2004 Aug 24.
8
Who needs 'lazy' workers? Inactive workers act as a 'reserve' labor force replacing active workers, but inactive workers are not replaced when they are removed.谁需要“懒惰”的工人?不活跃的工人充当替代活跃工人的“储备”劳动力,但不活跃的工人被移除时却不会被替代。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 6;12(9):e0184074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184074. eCollection 2017.
9
Individual versus social complexity, with particular reference to ant colonies.个体复杂性与社会复杂性,尤其以蚁群为例
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 May;76(2):211-37. doi: 10.1017/s1464793101005656.
10
Molecular and social regulation of worker division of labour in fire ants.分子和社会调节对火蚁工蚁分工的影响。
Mol Ecol. 2014 Feb;23(3):660-72. doi: 10.1111/mec.12626.

本文引用的文献

1
Explaining workers' inactivity in social colonies from first principles.从基本原则上解释社会群体中工人的不活跃性。
J R Soc Interface. 2023 Jan;20(198):20220808. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0808. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
2
When being flexible matters: Ecological underpinnings for the evolution of collective flexibility and task allocation.当灵活性至关重要时:集体灵活性和任务分配演变的生态基础。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 May 3;119(18):e2116066119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116066119. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
3
Warm and arid regions of the world are hotspots of superorganism complexity.
世界上温暖干旱的地区是超级生物复杂性的热点地区。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Feb 9;289(1968):20211899. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1899.
4
Multilevel Organisation of Animal Sociality.动物社会性的多层次组织。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2020 Sep;35(9):834-847. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.05.003. Epub 2020 May 27.
5
Within-individual behavioural variability and division of labour in social insects.个体内行为变异性与社会性昆虫的劳动分工。
J Exp Biol. 2019 May 24;222(Pt 10):jeb190868. doi: 10.1242/jeb.190868.
6
Behaviourally specialized foragers are less efficient and live shorter lives than generalists in wasp colonies.在黄蜂群体中,行为专门化的觅食者比多面手效率更低,寿命更短。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 29;9(1):5366. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41791-0.
7
Correlates and Consequences of Worker Polymorphism in Ants.蚂蚁工蚁多态性的关联和后果。
Annu Rev Entomol. 2018 Jan 7;63:575-598. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043357. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
8
Who Are the "Lazy" Ants? The Function of Inactivity in Social Insects and a Possible Role of Constraint: Inactive Ants Are Corpulent and May Be Young and/or Selfish.谁是“懒”蚂蚁?社会性昆虫中不活动的功能及限制的可能作用:不活动的蚂蚁体型肥胖,可能年幼且/或自私。
Integr Comp Biol. 2017 Sep 1;57(3):649-667. doi: 10.1093/icb/icx029.
9
Who needs 'lazy' workers? Inactive workers act as a 'reserve' labor force replacing active workers, but inactive workers are not replaced when they are removed.谁需要“懒惰”的工人?不活跃的工人充当替代活跃工人的“储备”劳动力,但不活跃的工人被移除时却不会被替代。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 6;12(9):e0184074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184074. eCollection 2017.
10
Foraging energetics of the ant, Paraponera clavata.子弹蚁的觅食能量学
Oecologia. 1996 Mar;105(4):419-427. doi: 10.1007/BF00330003.