Bainey Kevin R, Welsh Robert C, Zheng Yinggan, Arias-Mendoza Alexandra, Ristic Arsen D, Averkov Oleg V, Lambert Yves, Kerr Saraiva José F, Sepulveda Pablo, Rosell-Ortiz Fernando, French John K, Musić Ljilja B, Temple Tracy, Ly Eric, Bogaerts Kris, Sinnaeve Peter R, Danays Thierry, Westerhout Cynthia M, Van de Werf Frans, Armstrong Paul W
Canadian VIGOUR Centre (K.R.B., R.C.W., Y.Z., T.T., E.L., C.M.W., P.W.A.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute (K.R.B., R.C.W.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Dec;17(12):e014251. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014251. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
In STREAM-1 (Strategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction), excess intracranial hemorrhage occurred in patients aged ≥75 years receiving full-dose tenecteplase as part of a pharmaco-invasive strategy, whereas no further intracranial hemorrhage occurred after halving the tenecteplase dose. In STREAM-2 (Second Strategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction), half-dose tenecteplase was an effective and safe pharmaco-invasive strategy in older patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction presenting within <3 hours, compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We prespecified evaluating the efficacy and safety of a half-dose versus full-dose pharmaco-invasive strategy and compared the half-dose pharmaco-invasive strategy to primary PCI in patients aged ≥75 years.
We pooled data sets in patients aged ≥75 years from STREAM-1 and STREAM-2 receiving a pharmaco-invasive strategy versus primary PCI. Resolution of ST-segment-elevation after fibrinolysis and angiography was assessed, as was the relative risk of the primary composite of 30-day all-cause death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and shock, along with bleeding.
A total of 390 patients were included: 42 patients were randomized to full-dose pharmaco-invasive treatment, 205 patients to half-dose pharmaco-invasive treatment, and 143 patients to primary PCI. Half-dose versus full-dose pharmaco-invasive treatment resulted in similar proportions of patients achieving ≥50% ST-segment resolution posttenecteplase (63.2% versus 62.6%), with reduced intracranial hemorrhage (7.1% versus 0%, respectively). Half-dose pharmaco-invasive treatment and primary PCI also had similar proportions of patients with ≥50% ST-segment resolution postangiography (77.9% versus 72.4%; =0.277) and comparable composite end points (23.4% versus 28.0%; relative risk, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.62-1.30]; =0.567) without occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage.
Comparable efficacy exists between half- and full-dose tenecteplase pharmaco-invasive treatments with improved safety in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction aged ≥75 years. Half-dose pharmaco-invasive therapy is a legitimate therapeutic option for elderly patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction unable to access timely primary PCI.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00623623. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02777580.
在STREAM-1(心肌梗死后早期策略性再灌注)研究中,作为药物介入策略的一部分,接受全剂量替奈普酶治疗的≥75岁患者发生了颅内出血过多的情况,而替奈普酶剂量减半后未再发生颅内出血。在STREAM-2(第二次心肌梗死后早期策略性再灌注)研究中,与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)相比,半剂量替奈普酶对于发病时间<3小时的老年ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者是一种有效且安全的药物介入策略。我们预先设定要评估半剂量与全剂量药物介入策略的疗效和安全性,并比较半剂量药物介入策略与≥75岁患者的直接PCI治疗效果。
我们汇总了STREAM-1和STREAM-2研究中≥75岁接受药物介入策略或直接PCI治疗患者的数据集。评估了纤溶和血管造影术后ST段抬高的消退情况,以及30天全因死亡、心肌梗死、心力衰竭和休克的主要复合终点的相对风险,同时评估了出血情况。
共纳入390例患者:42例患者被随机分配至全剂量药物介入治疗组,205例患者被随机分配至半剂量药物介入治疗组,143例患者接受直接PCI治疗。半剂量与全剂量药物介入治疗相比,替奈普酶治疗后达到ST段抬高消退≥50%的患者比例相似(分别为63.2%和62.6%),颅内出血减少(分别为7.1%和0%)。半剂量药物介入治疗组和直接PCI治疗组在血管造影术后达到ST段抬高消退≥50%的患者比例也相似(分别为77.9%和72.4%;P=0.277),主要复合终点相当(分别为23.4%和28.0%;相对风险,0.90 [95% CI,0.62-1.30];P=0.567),且未发生颅内出血。
对于≥75岁的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者,半剂量和全剂量替奈普酶药物介入治疗疗效相当,安全性更高。对于无法及时接受直接PCI治疗的老年ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者,半剂量药物介入治疗是一种合理的治疗选择。
网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT0062362;网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT02777580。