Castiello Santiago, Ongchoco Joan Danielle K, van Buren Benjamin, Scholl Brian J, Corlett Philip R
Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Commun Psychol. 2024 Dec 17;2(1):117. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00163-9.
Paranoia (believing others intend harm) and excess teleological thinking (ascribing too much purpose) are non-consensual beliefs about agents. Human vision rapidly detects agents and their intentions. Might paranoia and teleology have roots in visual perception? Using displays that evoke the impression that one disc ('wolf') is chasing another ('sheep'), we find that paranoia and teleology involve perceiving chasing when there is none (studies 1 and 2) - errors we characterize as social hallucinations. When asked to identify the wolf or the sheep (studies 3, 4a, and 4b), we find high-paranoia participants struggled to identify sheep, while high-teleology participants were impaired at identifying wolves - both despite high-confidence. Both types of errors correlated with hallucinatory percepts in the real world. Although paranoia and teleology both involve excess perception of agency, the current results collectively suggest a perceptual distinction between the two, perhaps with clinical import.
偏执狂(认为他人意图伤害)和过度目的论思维(赋予过多目的)是关于行为主体的非共识性信念。人类视觉能快速察觉行为主体及其意图。偏执狂和目的论是否源于视觉感知呢?使用能让人产生一个圆盘(“狼”)在追逐另一个圆盘(“羊”)这种印象的展示,我们发现偏执狂和目的论涉及在不存在追逐的情况下感知到追逐(研究1和2)——我们将这些错误描述为社会幻觉。当被要求识别狼或羊时(研究3、4a和4b),我们发现高偏执狂参与者难以识别羊,而高目的论参与者在识别狼时存在障碍——尽管他们都高度自信。这两种错误类型都与现实世界中的幻觉感知相关。虽然偏执狂和目的论都涉及对行为主体的过度感知,但目前的结果共同表明了两者在感知上的区别,这或许具有临床意义。