Suppr超能文献

急性胆管炎期间采用大型球囊括约肌成形术清除胆总管结石。单中心倾向评分匹配队列研究。

Large balloon sphincteroplasty for CBD stone removal during acute cholangitis. Single center propensity-score matched cohort study.

作者信息

Ho Yin Henry Lee, Wai Yin Angus Chu, Chi Chuen Clarence Mak, Yiu Fung Au Yeung, Ning Fan, Ka Wing Keith Lui, Wai Lun Tao

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Yan Chai Hospital, HKSAR, Tsuen Wan, China.

Department of Medicine, Yan Chai Hospital, Tsuen Wan, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):1077-1085. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11402-9. Epub 2024 Dec 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic biliary drainage is the mainstay of treatment for acute cholangitis. CBD stone removal can be performed in same session with biliary drainage. Our team incorporated the use of endoscopic large balloon sphincteroplasty as an alternative for conventional papillotomy for biliary access. This study aims to identify tips and pitfalls of EPLBD usage during acute cholangitis.

METHOD

From the period October 2016 to April 2021, Yan Chai Hospital has 209 patients presented with acute cholangitis had ERCP for CBD stone removal performed. Among which, 50 patients had limited papillotomy followed by endoscopic large balloon papillary dilatation for biliary access (EPLBD), while 159 patients had conventional sphincterotomy (EST) done. Propensity score matching analysis was performed in a 1:1 ratio. Primary outcome was complete CBD stone removal as defined by clearance of occlusive cholangiogram. Secondary outcomes are post-ERCP pancreatitis, minor bleeding and major bleeding, flare up of sepsis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with one year recurrence rate. Kaplan Meier analysis was utilized for long-term recurrence rate after ERCP.

RESULT

In overall cohort, presence of large CBD stone & parapapillary diverticulum was more frequent in EPLBD group (26.0 ≤ 6.2% vs 9.4 ± 2.3%, p = 0.003) & (52.0 ± 7.1% vs 24.5 ± 3.4%, p < 0.001); they were balanced in PSM cohort. The complete CBD stone removal rate were higher in EPLBD group than EST group with statistical significance (80.0 ± 5.7% vs 54.0 ± 7.0%, p = 0.006). Major bleeding requiring reintervention was observed in 2.0 ± 2.0% vs 8.0 ± 3.8%, p = 0.169. Post ERCP pancreatitis were observed in 2.3 ± 2.2% vs 2.4 ± 2.4%, p = 0.960. 1 year recurrence rate was 14.0 ± 4.9% vs 2.0 .

CONCLUSION

Deployment of EPLBD during acute cholangitis demonstrated clinical efficacy in CBD stone clearance when compared with conventional sphincterotomy with a non-inferior safety profile. However, long term recurrence rate of acute cholangitis was observed to be higher.

摘要

背景

内镜下胆道引流是急性胆管炎治疗的主要手段。胆总管结石取出术可与胆道引流在同一次手术中进行。我们的团队采用内镜下大球囊括约肌成形术作为传统乳头切开术进行胆道通路建立的替代方法。本研究旨在确定急性胆管炎期间使用内镜下大球囊胆管扩张术(EPLBD)的技巧和陷阱。

方法

从2016年10月至2021年4月,仁济医院有209例急性胆管炎患者接受了内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)以取出胆总管结石。其中,50例患者先进行有限的乳头切开术,然后行内镜下大球囊乳头扩张术以建立胆道通路(EPLBD),而159例患者进行了传统的括约肌切开术(EST)。按1:1的比例进行倾向评分匹配分析。主要结局是根据阻塞性胆管造影的清除情况定义的胆总管结石完全清除。次要结局是ERCP术后胰腺炎、轻微出血和严重出血、败血症复发。进行逻辑回归分析以确定与一年复发率相关的危险因素。采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估ERCP后的长期复发率。

结果

在整个队列中,EPLBD组胆总管大结石和乳头旁憩室的发生率更高(26.0±6.2%对9.4±2.3%,p = 0.003)和(52.0±7.1%对24.5±3.4%,p < 0.001);在倾向评分匹配队列中它们是平衡的。EPLBD组的胆总管结石完全清除率高于EST组,具有统计学意义(80.0±5.7%对54.0±7.0%,p = 0.006)。需要再次干预的严重出血发生率为2.0±2.0%对8.0±3.8%,p = 0.169。ERCP术后胰腺炎的发生率为2.3±2.2%对2.4±2.4%,p = 0.960。1年复发率为14.0±4.9%对2.0±...

结论

与传统括约肌切开术相比,急性胆管炎期间采用EPLBD在胆总管结石清除方面显示出临床疗效,且安全性不劣。然而,观察到急性胆管炎的长期复发率较高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验