Pillay Tristan, O'Neill Anthony, Hay Philip, McAuliffe Michael
Townsville University Hospital, Queensland Health, Townsville, QLD, 4814, Australia.
James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4812, Australia.
J Orthop. 2024 Nov 26;64:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.11.024. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Given the relative rate of dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the need to further improve outcomes for all patients, various surgical methods have been developed that aim to restore the pre-arthritic alignment of the knee and lower limb. Common to these methodologies is a need to determine the pre-arthritic alignment of the knee and limb, thus producing defined targets for surgery. The aim of this paper was to compare the predicted pre-arthritic constitutional alignment of knee and lower limb calculated by the Flexion Extension Balancing Algorithm (FEBA) and the arithmetic HKA (aHKA) methods. The aHKA has been proposed as a means of accurately estimating the constitutional alignment of a knee and lower limb.
We calculated the proposed pre-arthritic alignment of 78 knees immediately prior to TKA surgery based on calculations using both methods. The results produced by the FEBA planning system (fHKA) were compared to the coronal plane alignment proposed by the aHKA process.
No significant difference was demonstrated between the pre-arthritic alignments calculated by the two methods. The mean aHKA was -1.5° (SD 3.38°; range -7.9°-6.9°) and the mean fHKA was -1.1° (SD 2.96°; range -8.1°-7.5°). The mean angular difference between the methods was 0.4° ±1.94; p = 0.146. The two methods produced alignment measurements with a strong positive correlation r = 0.82 p < 0.0001; R = 0.674.
There is a high correlation between the proposed pre-arthritic knee alignments when comparing the FEBA and arithmetic HKA methods. The pre-arthritic alignment of the knee is difficult to know with certainty. The use of both calculation methods will deliver a potential target zone for TKA knee alignment that makes use of all residual anatomy.
鉴于全膝关节置换术(TKA)后相对较高的不满意率以及进一步改善所有患者治疗效果的需求,已开发出多种手术方法,旨在恢复膝关节和下肢的关节炎前对线。这些方法的共同之处在于需要确定膝关节和肢体的关节炎前对线,从而为手术制定明确的目标。本文的目的是比较通过屈伸平衡算法(FEBA)和算术HKA(aHKA)方法计算出的膝关节和下肢预测关节炎前结构对线。aHKA已被提议作为一种准确估计膝关节和下肢结构对线的方法。
我们基于两种方法的计算,在TKA手术前立即计算了78个膝关节的提议关节炎前对线。将FEBA规划系统(fHKA)产生的结果与aHKA方法提出的冠状面排列进行比较。
两种方法计算出的关节炎前对线之间未显示出显著差异。平均aHKA为-1.5°(标准差3.38°;范围-7.9°至6.9°),平均fHKA为-1.1°(标准差2.96°;范围-8.1°至7.5°)。两种方法之间的平均角度差为0.4°±1.94;p = 0.146。两种方法产生的对线测量结果具有很强的正相关性,r = 0.82,p < 0.0001;R = 0.674。
在比较FEBA和算术HKA方法时,提议的关节炎前膝关节对线之间存在高度相关性。膝关节的关节炎前对线很难确切知晓。使用这两种计算方法将为TKA膝关节对线提供一个潜在的目标区域,该区域利用了所有剩余的解剖结构。