Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Compared with Surgical Resection in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Macrovascular Invasion: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

INTRODUCTION

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and macrovascular invasion (MVI) are recommended to receive systemic therapy according to guidelines. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and surgery are increasingly used in this patient population. This study compares outcomes from these local treatments.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with HCC with MVI and treated with surgery or SBRT between 1999 and 2022 were included. Propensity score matching minimized bias from confounders. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method,. and local, regional, and distant recurrences were assessed via competing risk methods. Univariable and multivariable analyses adjusted by the Lasso method evaluated OS predictors.

RESULTS

Among 175 patients, 38 underwent surgery and 137 received SBRT. The median age was 61 years, tumor volume was 158.6 cc, and α-fetoprotein level was 197 IU/mL. Most surgical patients had major resection (74%) via an open approach (97%). The median biologically effective dose (BED) for SBRT was 53.7 Gy. After matching, 35 patients per group had a median OS of 16 months. Local failure was higher in the SBRT group (20%) than in the surgery group (12%) at 1 year (p = 0.028). Distant failure was more frequent in surgery (54%) compared with SBRT (17%) [p = 0.003]. Excluding SBRT patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy did not change the results. In-hospital mortality was 9% post-surgery and 14% experienced post-SBRT liver impairment.

CONCLUSION

Both surgery and SBRT offer good long-term OS and control. Surgery provides better local control, while SBRT had lower distant relapse. While SBRT has acceptable toxicity, surgery carries a significant mortality risk.