Zhang Li, Aierken Alimire, Dong Ran, Zhang Mengru, Chen Qiang, Qiu Zhongmin
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Centre for Clinical Science, Respiratory Medicine, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK.
J Asthma. 2025 May;62(5):807-816. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2024.2444319. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
To investigate the inflammatory profiles of non-asthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis (NAEB), cough variant asthma (CVA), and classic asthma (CA) using fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) analysis to identify their unique inflammatory phenotypes.
This study involved cough patients newly diagnosed, corticosteroid-naïve with CVA ( = 68), NAEB ( = 53), and CA ( = 49). FeNO measurements at exhalation flow rates of 50 mL/s (FeNO) and 200 mL/s (FeNO) were conducted. The concentration of alveolar nitric oxide (CaNO) was calculated using a two-compartment model. Inflammatory mediators in induced sputum were also analyzed across the groups.
Significant differences in FeNO, FeNO, and CaNO levels were observed among the three groups (all < 0.001). Compared to NAEB, CVA patients demonstrated significantly higher FeNO levels (27.5 [interquartile range, IQR: 12.0-33.0] ppb vs. 16.0 [IQR: 12.5-22.0] ppb; = 0.008) but lower CaNO levels (2.6 [IQR: 1.0-4.3] ppb vs. 3.7 [IQR: 2.3-6.1] ppb; = 0.009). CA exhibited the highest levels of FeNO, FeNO, and CaNO compared to both NAEB and CVA (all < 0.01). In CVA, FeNO positively correlated with sputum eosinophils, IL-4, and LTC4, whereas NAEB showed elevated CaNO levels with higher sputum eosinophils, IL-5, and PGE2 (all < 0.05).
Inflammation predominantly affects the central airways in CVA and the peripheral airways in NAEB, with a more uniform distribution across the airway in CA. These discrepancies in airway inflammation may suggest distinct cough mechanisms in CVA, NAEB, and CA.
通过呼出一氧化氮分数(FeNO)分析,研究非哮喘性嗜酸性粒细胞性支气管炎(NAEB)、咳嗽变异性哮喘(CVA)和典型哮喘(CA)的炎症特征,以确定它们独特的炎症表型。
本研究纳入了新诊断的、未使用过皮质类固醇的咳嗽患者,其中CVA患者68例、NAEB患者53例、CA患者49例。分别在呼气流量为50 mL/s(FeNO)和200 mL/s(FeNO)时测量FeNO。使用双室模型计算肺泡一氧化氮(CaNO)浓度。同时对各组诱导痰中的炎症介质进行分析。
三组之间的FeNO、FeNO和CaNO水平存在显著差异(均P<0.001)。与NAEB相比,CVA患者的FeNO水平显著更高(27.5[四分位间距,IQR:12.0-33.0]ppb对16.0[IQR:12.5-22.0]ppb;P=0.008),但CaNO水平更低(2.6[IQR:1.0-4.3]ppb对3.7[IQR:2.3-6.1]ppb;P=0.009)。与NAEB和CVA相比,CA的FeNO、FeNO和CaNO水平均最高(均P<0.01)。在CVA中,FeNO与痰嗜酸性粒细胞、IL-4和LTC4呈正相关,而在NAEB中,CaNO水平随痰嗜酸性粒细胞、IL-5和PGE2升高而升高(均P<0.05)。
炎症在CVA中主要影响中央气道,在NAEB中主要影响外周气道,而在CA中气道分布更为均匀。气道炎症的这些差异可能提示CVA,NAEB和CA中存在不同的咳嗽机制。