Pertschuk L P, Eisenberg K B, Macchia R J, Feldman J G
Prostate. 1985;6(1):35-47. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990060106.
Prostatic neoplasms were studied for estrogen binding using four methods. Two employed fluorescent estrogen histochemical ligands, one was a new immunocytochemical technique using specific monoclonal antibodies to human estrophilin, and the last procedure was conventional biochemical dextran-coated charcoal assay. Results indicated that the fluorescent ligands recognized closely associated but separate estrogen-binding sites (putative type II sites) which in turn differed from the binding site measured biochemically. Studies with the monoclonal antibodies were nearly always negative, suggesting that prostatic estrogen receptor might vary antigenically from that present in breast and endometrium. Histochemical and biochemical androgen-binding studies were also compared and showed a close association. In the prediction of hormonal response in advanced prostate cancer both showed high sensitivity and low specificity. The addition of estrogen-binding data did not improve the predictive value of the androgen-binding histochemical assay. However, combining results of the biochemical and histochemical androgen-binding assays resulted in significant improvement of the specificity without loss of sensitivity, suggesting that there is a degree of positive interaction between the binding sites assayed by the two methods.
采用四种方法对前列腺肿瘤进行雌激素结合研究。两种方法使用荧光雌激素组织化学配体,一种是使用针对人雌激素结合蛋白的特异性单克隆抗体的新免疫细胞化学技术,最后一种方法是传统的生化葡聚糖包被活性炭测定法。结果表明,荧光配体识别紧密相关但相互分离的雌激素结合位点(推测为II型位点),这些位点又与生化测定的结合位点不同。单克隆抗体研究几乎总是呈阴性,这表明前列腺雌激素受体在抗原性上可能与乳腺和子宫内膜中的不同。还比较了组织化学和生化雄激素结合研究,结果显示两者密切相关。在预测晚期前列腺癌的激素反应方面,两者均显示出高敏感性和低特异性。添加雌激素结合数据并未提高雄激素结合组织化学测定的预测价值。然而,将生化和组织化学雄激素结合测定的结果相结合,可显著提高特异性而不损失敏感性,这表明两种方法测定的结合位点之间存在一定程度的正相互作用。