• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“生物……什么的实施?”通过人种志方法研究西班牙奶牛场中农场工人的主体性

'Implementation of bio…what?' Farm workers' subjectivities in Spanish dairy cattle farms through an ethnographic approach.

作者信息

Moya Sebastian, Espluga-Trenc Josep, Enticott Gareth

机构信息

Centre for Evidence-Based Veterinary Medicine (CEVM), School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, United Kingdom; Host-Pathogen Interactions (IHAP) - National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment (INRAE) - École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse (ENVT), Toulouse, France.

Institut de Govern i Polítiques Públiques / Departament de Sociologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès) 08193, Spain.

出版信息

Prev Vet Med. 2025 Feb;235:106407. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106407. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106407
PMID:39693771
Abstract

This study explores the implementation of biosecurity measures by farm workers through daily work routines on dairy cattle farms in Spain. The implementation of biosecurity measures on dairy cattle farms is mainly decided by farmers and veterinarians, but it is carried out by both farmers and farm workers. However, farm workers may be affected by socio-employment factors such as the precariousness of their work such that implementation of biosecurity measures may be context dependent and may differ from official recommendations. An ethnographic approach was used through observations and conversations on four farms in two regions of Spain, two in Galicia (north-west) and two in Catalonia (north-east) to explore these factors. The profiles of participants were farmer-family workers, internal worker-employees and external worker-employees. Results showed that there were social differences, particularly communicative and hierarchical differences, between workers and farmers that influenced the implementation of biosecurity measures. Workers implemented biosecurity practices incompletely, differently or incorrectly from their supervisors' instructions. Workers also relied on what the authors called an anthropomorphic approach to implementing biosecurity measures, which deviated from farm guidelines. In order to improve the implementation of biosecurity measures on dairy cattle farms, it is necessary to consider workers as key stakeholders in biosecurity. Such consideration could also help to professionalise workers, reduce their turnover and increase their permanence on these farms.

摘要

本研究探讨了西班牙奶牛场的农场工人通过日常工作流程实施生物安全措施的情况。奶牛场生物安全措施的实施主要由农民和兽医决定,但由农民和农场工人共同执行。然而,农场工人可能会受到社会就业因素的影响,比如工作的不稳定,以至于生物安全措施的实施可能取决于具体情况,可能与官方建议有所不同。通过对西班牙两个地区的四个农场(加利西亚地区(西北部)两个,加泰罗尼亚地区(东北部)两个)进行观察和对话,采用人种志方法来探究这些因素。参与者包括农民家庭工人、内部职工和外部雇工。结果表明,工人与农民之间存在社会差异,尤其是沟通和等级差异,这影响了生物安全措施的实施。工人实施生物安全措施时不完全、不同或不正确地遵循主管的指示。工人还依赖作者所称的拟人化方法来实施生物安全措施,这偏离了农场的指导方针。为了改善奶牛场生物安全措施的实施情况,有必要将工人视为生物安全的关键利益相关者。这种考虑也有助于使工人专业化,减少他们的流动率,并增加他们在这些农场的留存率。

相似文献

1
'Implementation of bio…what?' Farm workers' subjectivities in Spanish dairy cattle farms through an ethnographic approach.“生物……什么的实施?”通过人种志方法研究西班牙奶牛场中农场工人的主体性
Prev Vet Med. 2025 Feb;235:106407. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106407. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
2
Dairy farmers' decision-making to implement biosecurity measures: A study of psychosocial factors.奶农实施生物安全措施的决策:心理社会因素研究。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020 Mar;67(2):698-710. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13387. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
3
Influence on the implementation of biosecurity measures in dairy cattle farms: Communication between veterinarians and dairy farmers.对奶牛场生物安全措施实施的影响:兽医与奶牛场主之间的沟通。
Prev Vet Med. 2021 May;190:105329. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105329. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
4
Perceived barriers to implementation of biosecurity best management practices for control of Salmonella Dublin on dairy farms: A focus group study.奶牛场控制都柏林沙门氏菌的生物安全最佳管理实践实施中的认知障碍:一项焦点小组研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2025 May;108(5):5233-5243. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-25676. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
5
Government veterinarians' perceptions of routine biosecurity focused on dairy cattle farms in north-western and north-eastern Spain.西班牙西北部和东北部政府兽医对奶牛场常规生物安全的看法。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Feb 8;10:1043966. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1043966. eCollection 2023.
6
Broken biosecurity? Veterinarians' framing of biosecurity on dairy farms in England.生物安全漏洞?英国兽医对奶牛场生物安全的界定
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Sep 15;132:20-31. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
7
Ontario dairy producers' and veterinarians' perspectives: Barriers to biosecurity implementation.安大略省奶农和兽医的观点:生物安全实施的障碍。
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Aug;107(8):5738-5753. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-24029. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
8
Adoption of Biosecurity Practices in Smallholder Dairy Farms in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚小农户奶牛场生物安全措施的采用情况。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2023 Aug 14;2023:2277409. doi: 10.1155/2023/2277409. eCollection 2023.
9
Canadian dairy farmers' perception of the efficacy of biosecurity practices.加拿大奶农对生物安全措施效果的认知。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Nov;102(11):10657-10669. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16312. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
10
Biosecurity practices in Belgian veal calf farming: Level of implementation, attitudes, strengths, weaknesses and constraints.比利时小牛肉犊养殖中的生物安保措施:实施水平、态度、优势、劣势和制约因素。
Prev Vet Med. 2019 Nov 15;172:104768. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104768. Epub 2019 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholders' perspectives on communicating biosecurity to encourage behavior change in farmers.利益相关者对生物安全信息传播以鼓励农民改变行为的看法。
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Mar 19;12:1562648. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1562648. eCollection 2025.