Myers Emily K, Eyal Keren, Diaz-Miron Jose L, Pickett-Nairne Kaci L, Orehova Jaclyn E, Vangi Sarah C, Malham Mark B, Hill Lauren R S, Adelgais Kathleen M, Hills-Dunlap Jonathan L, Reppucci Marina L, Acker Shannon N
University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13001 E. 17th Pl., Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13001 E. 17th Pl., Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Children's Hospital Colorado, 13123 E. 16th Ave., Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
J Pediatr Surg. 2025 Mar;60(3):162084. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162084. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
Traumatic injuries remain the leading cause of death in children aged 1-14. Previous research demonstrates a link between lower socioeconomic status (SES) and higher pediatric injury morbidity and mortality. There is scant research exploring the relationship between neighborhood disadvantage and pediatric trauma. This study utilizes Area Deprivation Index (ADI) to understand the relationship between pediatric traumatic injury mechanisms, severity, and outcomes and neighborhood disadvantage.
We performed a single-center cross-sectional analysis of pediatric trauma patients aged 0-18 presenting to our Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center from 2016 to 2021. Patients were stratified into quintiles by national ADI. Injury mechanisms and severity markers were analyzed across ADI quintiles. A subset analysis was also performed, comparing complications and outcomes across ADI quintiles for severely injured patients.
Children from areas of higher disadvantage experienced higher rates of injuries related to automobiles, non-accidental trauma (NAT)/assault/neglect, penetrating injuries, and thermal injuries (p < 0.001). Children from areas of low disadvantage incurred more injuries related to sports (p < 0.001) and falls (p = 0.002). Multiple markers of trauma severity increased with increasing neighborhood disadvantage. No differences were found in clinical outcomes in the subset of most severely injured children.
Mechanisms and severity of traumatic injuries among children vary with degree of neighborhood disadvantage. Outcomes did not differ by ADI quintile in the most severely injured children. ADI may be a tool for identifying children at higher risk for certain injury mechanisms and more severe injuries and could be used to target injury prevention interventions to more vulnerable communities.
Retrospective cross-sectional analysis.
Level IV.
创伤性损伤仍然是1至14岁儿童死亡的主要原因。先前的研究表明,社会经济地位较低(SES)与儿童损伤发病率和死亡率较高之间存在联系。探索邻里劣势与儿童创伤之间关系的研究很少。本研究利用地区贫困指数(ADI)来了解儿童创伤性损伤机制、严重程度和结局与邻里劣势之间的关系。
我们对2016年至2021年在我们的一级儿童创伤中心就诊的0至18岁儿童创伤患者进行了单中心横断面分析。患者按全国ADI分为五分位数。分析了各ADI五分位数的损伤机制和严重程度指标。还进行了一项亚组分析,比较了重伤患者各ADI五分位数的并发症和结局。
来自劣势程度较高地区的儿童与汽车、非意外创伤(NAT)/袭击/忽视、穿透伤和热伤相关的损伤发生率较高(p < 0.001)。来自劣势程度较低地区的儿童与运动相关的损伤(p < 0.001)和跌倒相关的损伤(p = 0.002)更多。随着邻里劣势的增加,多个创伤严重程度指标也增加。在最重伤儿童亚组中,临床结局没有差异。
儿童创伤性损伤的机制和严重程度随邻里劣势程度而变化。在最重伤儿童中,结局在ADI五分位数之间没有差异。ADI可能是一种识别某些损伤机制和更严重损伤风险较高儿童的工具,可用于针对更脆弱社区开展伤害预防干预措施。
回顾性横断面分析。
四级。