Suppr超能文献

出院后2型糖尿病患者连续血糖监测与毛细血管血糖检测对比的随机研究

Randomized Study Comparing Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Capillary Glucose Testing in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes After Hospital Discharge.

作者信息

Umpierrez Guillermo E, Castro-Revoredo Iris, Moazzami Bobak, Nayberg Irina, Zabala Zohyra, Galindo Rodolfo J, Vellanki Priyathama, Peng Limin, Klonoff David C

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Endocr Pract. 2025 Mar;31(3):286-291. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2024.11.018. Epub 2024 Dec 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The benefits of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in managing hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been documented in observation and intervention clinical studies. However, the benefits of CGMs after hospital discharge in improving the care of patients with T2D remain unknown.

METHODS

This pilot randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of using the FreeStyle Libre 2 CGM vs capillary point-of-care (POC) glucose testing (standard of care) in insulin-treated patients with T2D for up to 12 weeks after hospital discharge. We assessed safety (hypoglycemia), efficacy (mean daily glucose), and healthcare utilization (emergency room visits and hospital admissions) associated with the use of FreeStyle Libre 2 CGM compared to capillary POC testing following hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Among 100 participants (mean age 54.3 ± 10.7 years, HbA1c 10.46 ± 2.24%, median diabetes duration of 9.0 years, IQR 1.0, 42), there were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics between the groups at discharge. We observed a trend toward improved glycemic control in the CGM group, including increased time in range 70-180 mg/dl, reduced time above range > 180 and 250 mg/dl, and decreased hypoglycemia and insulin requirements after discharge compared to the POC group. There were no differences in emergency room visits or hospitalization between the study groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of this pilot study indicate that the use of CGM leads to improved glycemic control, reduced hypoglycemia, and decreased glucose variability compared to POC glucose testing after hospital discharge.

摘要

目的

观察性和干预性临床研究已证明持续葡萄糖监测(CGM)在管理2型糖尿病(T2D)住院患者高血糖方面的益处。然而,出院后CGM在改善T2D患者护理方面的益处仍不明确。

方法

这项初步随机临床试验旨在比较在出院后长达12周的时间里,使用FreeStyle Libre 2 CGM与毛细血管即时检测(POC)血糖检测(护理标准)对接受胰岛素治疗的T2D患者的有效性和安全性。我们评估了与出院后使用FreeStyle Libre 2 CGM相比,毛细血管POC检测相关的安全性(低血糖)、疗效(平均每日血糖)和医疗资源利用情况(急诊就诊和住院)。

结果

在100名参与者中(平均年龄54.3±10.7岁,糖化血红蛋白10.46±2.24%,糖尿病病程中位数为9.0年,四分位距1.0,42),出院时两组间的基线临床特征无显著差异。我们观察到CGM组血糖控制有改善的趋势,包括血糖在70 - 180mg/dl范围内的时间增加,高于180和250mg/dl范围的时间减少,以及出院后低血糖和胰岛素需求减少,与POC组相比。研究组在急诊就诊或住院方面无差异。

结论

这项初步研究的结果表明,与出院后POC血糖检测相比,使用CGM可改善血糖控制,降低低血糖发生率,并减少血糖变异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验