Suppr超能文献

[胫腓下联合损伤重建中螺钉植入角度的生物力学研究]

[Biomechanical study of screw implant angle in reconstruction of tibiofibular syndesmosis injury].

作者信息

Zhang Lei, Li Minghui, Zhang Mengyao, Xiong Jixiang, Wang Junqiu, Zhou Xin, Shi Houyin, Wang Guoyou

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, the Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou Sichuan, 646000, P. R. China.

Center for Orthopedic Diseases Research, the Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou Sichuan, 646000, P. R. China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Dec 15;38(12):1480-1485. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202406079.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate ideal screw implant angle in reconstruction of tibiofibular syndesmosis injury by using a biomechanical test.

METHODS

A total of 24 ankle specimens from adult cadavers were used as the tibiofibular syndesmosis injury model. According to the angle of screw placement, the tibiofibular syndesmosis injury models were randomly divided into groups A (0°), B (10°-15°), C (20°-25°), and D (30°-35°), and the screws were placed at a level 2 cm proximal to the ankle joint. The displacement of fibula was measured by biomechanical testing machine at neutral, dorsiflexion (10°), plantar flexion (15°), varus (10°), and valgus (15°) positions, with axial load of 0-700 N (pressure separation test). The displacement of fibula was also measured at neutral position by applying 0-5 N·m torque load during internal and external rotation (torsional separation test).

RESULTS

In the pressure separation test, group C exhibited the smallest displacement under different positions and load conditions. At neutral position, significant differences were observed ( <0.05) between group A and group C under load of 300-700 N, as well as between group B and group C under all load conditions. At dorsiflexion position, significant differences were observed ( <0.05) between group A and group C under load of 500-700 N, as well as between groups B, D and group C under all load conditions, and the displacements under all load conditions were significantly smaller in group A than in group B ( <0.05). At plantar flexion position, significant differences were observed ( <0.05) between group D and group C under all load conditions. At valgus position, significant differences were observed ( <0.05) between group A and group C under load of 400-700 N, as well as between groups B, D and group C under all load conditions. In the torsional separation test, group C exhibited the smallest displacement and group B had the largest displacement under different load conditions. During internal rotation, significant differences were observed ( <0.05) between group B and group C under all load conditions, as well as between group D and group C at load of 3-5 N·m. During external rotation, significant differences were observed between groups B, D and group C under all load conditions ( <0.05). No significant difference was detected between groups at the remaining load conditions ( >0.05).

CONCLUSION

The ideal screw implant angle in reconstruction of tibiofibular syndesmosis injury was 20°-25°, which has a small displacement of fibula.

摘要

目的

通过生物力学试验研究胫腓下联合损伤重建中理想的螺钉植入角度。

方法

取24例成年尸体踝关节标本作为胫腓下联合损伤模型。根据螺钉置入角度,将胫腓下联合损伤模型随机分为A组(0°)、B组(10° - 15°)、C组(20° - 25°)和D组(30° - 35°),在踝关节近端2 cm处置入螺钉。通过生物力学试验机在中立位、背屈(10°)、跖屈(15°)、内翻(10°)和外翻(15°)位测量腓骨移位情况,轴向载荷为0 - 700 N(压力分离试验)。在内旋和外旋时施加0 - 5 N·m扭矩载荷,在中立位测量腓骨移位情况(扭转分离试验)。

结果

在压力分离试验中,C组在不同位置和载荷条件下腓骨移位最小。在中立位,300 - 700 N载荷下A组与C组之间以及所有载荷条件下B组与C组之间均观察到显著差异(<0.05)。在背屈位,500 - 700 N载荷下A组与C组之间以及所有载荷条件下B组、D组与C组之间均观察到显著差异(<0.05),且所有载荷条件下A组的移位均显著小于B组(<0.05)。在跖屈位,所有载荷条件下D组与C组之间均观察到显著差异(<0.05)。在外翻位,400 - 700 N载荷下A组与C组之间以及所有载荷条件下B组、D组与C组之间均观察到显著差异(<0.05)。在扭转分离试验中,C组在不同载荷条件下移位最小,B组移位最大。在内旋时,所有载荷条件下B组与C组之间以及3 - 5 N·m载荷下D组与C组之间均观察到显著差异(<0.05)。在外旋时,所有载荷条件下B组、D组与C组之间均观察到显著差异(<0.05)。在其余载荷条件下各组间未检测到显著差异(>0.05)。

结论

胫腓下联合损伤重建中理想的螺钉植入角度为20° - 25°,此时腓骨移位较小。

相似文献

1
[Biomechanical study of screw implant angle in reconstruction of tibiofibular syndesmosis injury].
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Dec 15;38(12):1480-1485. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202406079.
2
Biomechanical comparison of bionic, screw and Endobutton fixation in the treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries.
Int Orthop. 2016 Feb;40(2):307-14. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2920-6. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
5
Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Current Ankle Syndesmosis Repair Techniques.
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Feb;38(2):200-207. doi: 10.1177/1071100716666278. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
7
[TREATMENT OF PRONATION EXTERNAL ROTATION ANKLE FRACTURE COMBINED WITH SEPARATION OF DISTAL TIBIOFIBULAR SYNDESMOSIS].
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 8;30(9):1081-1084. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.20160220.
8
Syndesmosis fixation using dual 3.5 mm and 4.5 mm screws with tricortical and quadricortical purchase: a biomechanical study.
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 May;34(5):734-9. doi: 10.1177/1071100713478923. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
9
Biomechanical comparison of screw, tightrope and novel double endobutton in the treatment of tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries.
Injury. 2021 Oct;52(10):2813-2819. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
10
Motion of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis under different loading patterns: A biomechanical study.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 May-Aug;27(2):2309499019842879. doi: 10.1177/2309499019842879.

本文引用的文献

2
Comparison of Suture-Button Versus Syndesmotic Screw in the Treatment of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury: A Meta-analysis.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 May-Jun;60(3):555-566. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
3
Indications and Surgical Treatment of Acute and Chronic Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Injuries with and Without Associated Fractures.
Foot Ankle Clin. 2021 Mar;26(1):103-119. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2020.10.006. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
4
Traumatic injuries of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Feb;107(1S):102778. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102778. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
5
Mechanisms of acute ankle syndesmosis ligament injuries in professional male rugby union players: a systematic visual video analysis.
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Jun;55(12):691-696. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102281. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
6
Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Syndesmotic Plate Compared With Traditional Screw and Suture Button Fixation.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 May-Jun;59(3):522-528. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.07.025. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
7
Diagnosis and treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis lesions.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Dec;105(8S):S275-S286. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.014. Epub 2019 Oct 5.
8
A Perceptual Framework for Conservative Treatment and Rehabilitation of Ankle Sprains: An Evidence-Based Paradigm Shift.
J Athl Train. 2019 Jun;54(6):628-638. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-474-17. Epub 2019 May 28.
9
Anatomic Ligament Repairs of Syndesmotic Injuries.
Orthop Clin North Am. 2019 Jul;50(3):401-414. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
10
Syndesmotic screw fixation in tibiofibular diastasis.
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;21(6):692-697. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_5_17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验