• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Biomechanical study of screw implant angle in reconstruction of tibiofibular syndesmosis injury].[胫腓下联合损伤重建中螺钉植入角度的生物力学研究]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Dec 15;38(12):1480-1485. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202406079.
2
Biomechanical comparison of bionic, screw and Endobutton fixation in the treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries.仿生、螺钉和Endobutton固定治疗胫腓下联合损伤的生物力学比较
Int Orthop. 2016 Feb;40(2):307-14. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2920-6. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
3
[Biomechanical study on repairing distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries with artificial ligaments].[人工韧带修复下胫腓联合损伤的生物力学研究]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Oct;28(10):1217-20.
4
[Biomechanical study on different internal fixation methods of joint stability reconstruction of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury].[不同内固定方法对下胫腓联合损伤关节稳定性重建的生物力学研究]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2015 Dec;28(12):1147-52.
5
Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Current Ankle Syndesmosis Repair Techniques.三种当前踝关节下胫腓联合修复技术的生物力学比较
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Feb;38(2):200-207. doi: 10.1177/1071100716666278. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
6
Effects of ligament sectioning on the kinematics of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a radiostereometric study of 10 cadaveric specimens based on presumed trauma mechanisms with suggestions for treatment.韧带切断对胫腓下联合运动学的影响:基于假定创伤机制对10个尸体标本的放射性立体测量研究及治疗建议
Acta Orthop. 2006 Jun;77(3):531-40. doi: 10.1080/17453670610012557.
7
[TREATMENT OF PRONATION EXTERNAL ROTATION ANKLE FRACTURE COMBINED WITH SEPARATION OF DISTAL TIBIOFIBULAR SYNDESMOSIS].[旋前外旋型踝关节骨折合并下胫腓联合分离的治疗]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 8;30(9):1081-1084. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.20160220.
8
Syndesmosis fixation using dual 3.5 mm and 4.5 mm screws with tricortical and quadricortical purchase: a biomechanical study.双 3.5 毫米和 4.5 毫米螺钉联合三皮质和四皮质固定距骨-跟骨联合:一项生物力学研究。
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 May;34(5):734-9. doi: 10.1177/1071100713478923. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
9
Biomechanical comparison of screw, tightrope and novel double endobutton in the treatment of tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries.螺钉、韧带重建和新型双 Endobutton 在治疗胫腓联合损伤中的生物力学比较。
Injury. 2021 Oct;52(10):2813-2819. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
10
Motion of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis under different loading patterns: A biomechanical study.不同负荷模式下胫腓下联合的运动:一项生物力学研究。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 May-Aug;27(2):2309499019842879. doi: 10.1177/2309499019842879.

本文引用的文献

1
[TightRope elastic fixation combined with functional total repair of inferior tibiofibular ligament in treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury].[弹性固定结合下胫腓韧带功能重建治疗下胫腓联合损伤]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Aug 15;37(8):964-969. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202305020.
2
Comparison of Suture-Button Versus Syndesmotic Screw in the Treatment of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury: A Meta-analysis.缝合纽扣与下胫腓联合螺钉治疗下胫腓联合损伤的比较:Meta 分析。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 May-Jun;60(3):555-566. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
3
Indications and Surgical Treatment of Acute and Chronic Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Injuries with and Without Associated Fractures.伴有或不伴有相关骨折的急慢性胫腓下联合损伤的适应症及手术治疗
Foot Ankle Clin. 2021 Mar;26(1):103-119. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2020.10.006. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
4
Traumatic injuries of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.下胫腓联合的创伤性损伤。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Feb;107(1S):102778. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102778. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
5
Mechanisms of acute ankle syndesmosis ligament injuries in professional male rugby union players: a systematic visual video analysis.职业男子英式橄榄球联盟球员急性踝关节联合韧带损伤的机制:系统视觉视频分析
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Jun;55(12):691-696. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102281. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
6
Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Syndesmotic Plate Compared With Traditional Screw and Suture Button Fixation.新型下胫腓联合板与传统螺钉和缝线纽扣固定的生物力学分析。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 May-Jun;59(3):522-528. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.07.025. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
7
Diagnosis and treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis lesions.诊断和治疗胫腓联合损伤。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Dec;105(8S):S275-S286. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.014. Epub 2019 Oct 5.
8
A Perceptual Framework for Conservative Treatment and Rehabilitation of Ankle Sprains: An Evidence-Based Paradigm Shift.踝关节扭伤的保守治疗和康复的感知框架:基于证据的范式转变。
J Athl Train. 2019 Jun;54(6):628-638. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-474-17. Epub 2019 May 28.
9
Anatomic Ligament Repairs of Syndesmotic Injuries.下胫腓联合损伤的解剖学韧带修复术
Orthop Clin North Am. 2019 Jul;50(3):401-414. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
10
Syndesmotic screw fixation in tibiofibular diastasis.胫腓骨分离的下胫腓联合螺钉固定术
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;21(6):692-697. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_5_17.

[胫腓下联合损伤重建中螺钉植入角度的生物力学研究]

[Biomechanical study of screw implant angle in reconstruction of tibiofibular syndesmosis injury].

作者信息

Zhang Lei, Li Minghui, Zhang Mengyao, Xiong Jixiang, Wang Junqiu, Zhou Xin, Shi Houyin, Wang Guoyou

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, the Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou Sichuan, 646000, P. R. China.

Center for Orthopedic Diseases Research, the Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou Sichuan, 646000, P. R. China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Dec 15;38(12):1480-1485. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202406079.

DOI:10.7507/1002-1892.202406079
PMID:39694838
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11655369/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate ideal screw implant angle in reconstruction of tibiofibular syndesmosis injury by using a biomechanical test.

METHODS

A total of 24 ankle specimens from adult cadavers were used as the tibiofibular syndesmosis injury model. According to the angle of screw placement, the tibiofibular syndesmosis injury models were randomly divided into groups A (0°), B (10°-15°), C (20°-25°), and D (30°-35°), and the screws were placed at a level 2 cm proximal to the ankle joint. The displacement of fibula was measured by biomechanical testing machine at neutral, dorsiflexion (10°), plantar flexion (15°), varus (10°), and valgus (15°) positions, with axial load of 0-700 N (pressure separation test). The displacement of fibula was also measured at neutral position by applying 0-5 N·m torque load during internal and external rotation (torsional separation test).

RESULTS

In the pressure separation test, group C exhibited the smallest displacement under different positions and load conditions. At neutral position, significant differences were observed ( <0.05) between group A and group C under load of 300-700 N, as well as between group B and group C under all load conditions. At dorsiflexion position, significant differences were observed ( <0.05) between group A and group C under load of 500-700 N, as well as between groups B, D and group C under all load conditions, and the displacements under all load conditions were significantly smaller in group A than in group B ( <0.05). At plantar flexion position, significant differences were observed ( <0.05) between group D and group C under all load conditions. At valgus position, significant differences were observed ( <0.05) between group A and group C under load of 400-700 N, as well as between groups B, D and group C under all load conditions. In the torsional separation test, group C exhibited the smallest displacement and group B had the largest displacement under different load conditions. During internal rotation, significant differences were observed ( <0.05) between group B and group C under all load conditions, as well as between group D and group C at load of 3-5 N·m. During external rotation, significant differences were observed between groups B, D and group C under all load conditions ( <0.05). No significant difference was detected between groups at the remaining load conditions ( >0.05).

CONCLUSION

The ideal screw implant angle in reconstruction of tibiofibular syndesmosis injury was 20°-25°, which has a small displacement of fibula.

摘要

目的

通过生物力学试验研究胫腓下联合损伤重建中理想的螺钉植入角度。

方法

取24例成年尸体踝关节标本作为胫腓下联合损伤模型。根据螺钉置入角度,将胫腓下联合损伤模型随机分为A组(0°)、B组(10° - 15°)、C组(20° - 25°)和D组(30° - 35°),在踝关节近端2 cm处置入螺钉。通过生物力学试验机在中立位、背屈(10°)、跖屈(15°)、内翻(10°)和外翻(15°)位测量腓骨移位情况,轴向载荷为0 - 700 N(压力分离试验)。在内旋和外旋时施加0 - 5 N·m扭矩载荷,在中立位测量腓骨移位情况(扭转分离试验)。

结果

在压力分离试验中,C组在不同位置和载荷条件下腓骨移位最小。在中立位,300 - 700 N载荷下A组与C组之间以及所有载荷条件下B组与C组之间均观察到显著差异(<0.05)。在背屈位,500 - 700 N载荷下A组与C组之间以及所有载荷条件下B组、D组与C组之间均观察到显著差异(<0.05),且所有载荷条件下A组的移位均显著小于B组(<0.05)。在跖屈位,所有载荷条件下D组与C组之间均观察到显著差异(<0.05)。在外翻位,400 - 700 N载荷下A组与C组之间以及所有载荷条件下B组、D组与C组之间均观察到显著差异(<0.05)。在扭转分离试验中,C组在不同载荷条件下移位最小,B组移位最大。在内旋时,所有载荷条件下B组与C组之间以及3 - 5 N·m载荷下D组与C组之间均观察到显著差异(<0.05)。在外旋时,所有载荷条件下B组、D组与C组之间均观察到显著差异(<0.05)。在其余载荷条件下各组间未检测到显著差异(>0.05)。

结论

胫腓下联合损伤重建中理想的螺钉植入角度为20° - 25°,此时腓骨移位较小。