Suppr超能文献

超声造影联合定量分析在Bosniak≥II级囊性肾肿块中的临床价值

Clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with quantitative analysis in Bosniak ≥ II cystic renal masses.

作者信息

He Hua-Bin, Jin Xuan-Chen, Liu Yun-Cai, Chen Yu-Xuan, Vaishnani Deep K, Xia Yong-Sheng, Xie Zuo-Liu, Wang Xiao-Qiao, Lan Li, Zhou Man

机构信息

Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, Yiwu Central Hospital, Yiwu, China.

Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Dec 18. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04744-4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The 2019 Bosniak classification has improved the precise and detailed quantitative evaluation criteria, making the diagnosis of cystic renal masses (CRMs) more accurate and objective. This study addresses the clinical value of quantitative analysis and aims to investigate the feasibility of combining contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with quantitative analysis for diagnosing Bosniak ≥ II CRMs.

METHODS

We retrospectively obtained 58 CRMs with confirmed pathology, which underwent CEUS and Contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CECT) evaluations according to Bosniak classification between January 2013 and August 2024. These lesions were divided into benign and malignant groups, followed by a quantitative analysis of the morphological details detected by CEUS. All morphological parameters were compared, and the diagnostic efficiencies were evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, logistic regression (LR) analysis, and diagnostic curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, a cohort of 72 lesions was monitored for a period of ≥ 3 years, and changes in Bosniak classification were analyzed by categorizing them into stable, upgraded, and downgraded categories.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between CEUS and CECT in our cohort's malignancy predictive rates across different Bosniak grades (p = 0.640). All morphological quantitative parameters showed statistically significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis revealed that the sum of enhanced wall thickness and enhanced septum thickness among quantitative parameters had the highest AUC value (AUC: 0.9226). Both LR models demonstrated superior clinical diagnostic performance with similar level of accuracy between qualitative and quantitative analysis, as evidenced by ROC (AUC: 0.9470, 0.9619, respectively) and DCA analyses. None of the lesions in the follow-up cohort were upgraded, suggesting that CRMs are relatively stable tumors with a low malignant potential.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study demonstrated that CEUS combined with Bosniak classification and quantitative analysis could enhance diagnostic confidence in differentiating Bosniak ≥ II CRMs and could serve as a viable alternative to CECT in specific cases.

摘要

目的

2019年博斯尼亚克分类法改进了精确且详细的定量评估标准,使肾囊性肿块(CRM)的诊断更加准确和客观。本研究探讨定量分析的临床价值,并旨在研究将超声造影(CEUS)与定量分析相结合用于诊断博斯尼亚克≥II级CRM的可行性。

方法

我们回顾性收集了58例经病理证实的CRM,这些病例在2013年1月至2024年8月期间根据博斯尼亚克分类法接受了CEUS和对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)评估。将这些病变分为良性和恶性组,随后对CEUS检测到的形态细节进行定量分析。比较所有形态学参数,并使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、逻辑回归(LR)分析和诊断曲线分析(DCA)评估诊断效率。此外,对一组72个病变进行了≥3年的监测,并通过将其分类为稳定、升级和降级类别来分析博斯尼亚克分类的变化。

结果

分析显示,在我们的队列中,不同博斯尼亚克分级的CEUS和CECT恶性预测率之间无统计学显著差异(p = 0.640)。所有形态学定量参数在两组之间均显示出统计学显著差异(p < 0.001)。ROC曲线分析显示,定量参数中增强壁厚度和增强间隔厚度之和的AUC值最高(AUC:0.9226)。两个LR模型均显示出卓越的临床诊断性能,定性和定量分析之间的准确性水平相似,ROC(分别为AUC:0.9470、0.9619)和DCA分析证明了这一点。随访队列中的病变均未升级,表明CRM是相对稳定的肿瘤,恶性潜能较低。

结论

这项回顾性研究表明,CEUS结合博斯尼亚克分类法和定量分析可增强鉴别博斯尼亚克≥II级CRM的诊断信心,并在特定情况下可作为CECT的可行替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验