Zhou Mengge, Zhang Lan, He Tianjing, Zhu Shuzhen, Tang Yumeng, Li Qian, Shen Miaoyan, Pan Jingju
Institute of Chronic Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, Hubei, 430079, People's Republic of China.
Popul Health Metr. 2024 Dec 18;22(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12963-024-00359-5.
The disability weight (DW) reflects the severity of non-fatal outcomes and is an important parameter in calculating the burden of disease. However, the universality of the global, national, or subnational DWs remains controversial. This study aims to measure DWs specific to Hubei Province of China using non-parametric regression to anchor the DWs.
Paired comparison (PC) data collected from a web-based survey in Hubei Province targeting the general population were used to estimate the DWs of 196 health states. Specifically, PC data from 33,925 respondents were analyzed by probit regression analysis, and the results were then anchored to 0-1 scale using non-parametric regression based on the DWs from Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2013. The absolute DW values and rankings were compared to those in the Chinese disability weight measurement study, GBD 2013, and Japan.
The DWs for 196 health states ranged from 0.003 for mild distance vision impairment to 0.663 for severe heroin and opioid dependence in Hubei Province, China. Quite a lot mental disorders, such as moderate/severe episode of major depressive disorder, were considered more severe than the terminal phase with/without medication among Hubei residents. DW rankings of the health states are relatively stable in Hubei Province irrespective of the anchoring method used. A very small proportion (4 of 196, 2%) of DW rankings changed by 10 or more positions in China when compared with our results, but approximately 61% in GBD 2013 and 59% in Japan. Among the top 25 health states in this study, 9 of 11 health states categorized as mental, behavioral, and substance use disorders resulted in a lower ranking in GBD 2013, and all 6 states in Japan also showed a lower ranking, whereas China shared a similar ranking.
The burden of mental disorders among Hubei residents, especially moderate or severe major depressive disorder, deserves further attention. When using different anchoring methods, DW rankings were maintained relatively stable rather than the absolute values in Hubei. Substantial differences of DW rankings between our results and that in China, GBD 2013, and Japan draw attention to the need for deriving local disability for disease burden calculation.
残疾权重(DW)反映了非致命性后果的严重程度,是计算疾病负担的一个重要参数。然而,全球、国家或次国家级残疾权重的普遍性仍存在争议。本研究旨在使用非参数回归来确定残疾权重,从而测量中国湖北省特有的残疾权重。
从湖北省针对普通人群的一项基于网络的调查中收集的配对比较(PC)数据,用于估计196种健康状态的残疾权重。具体而言,通过概率回归分析对33925名受访者的PC数据进行分析,然后基于《2013年全球疾病负担》(GBD 2013)中的残疾权重,使用非参数回归将结果锚定到0-1量表。将绝对残疾权重值和排名与中国残疾权重测量研究、GBD 2013和日本的进行比较。
在中国湖北省,196种健康状态的残疾权重范围从轻度远视力损害的0.003到重度海洛因和阿片类药物依赖的0.663。相当多的精神障碍,如中度/重度重度抑郁症发作,在湖北居民中被认为比有/无药物治疗的终末期更为严重。无论使用何种锚定方法,湖北省健康状态的残疾权重排名相对稳定。与我们的结果相比,在中国,只有很小一部分(196种中的4种,2%)残疾权重排名变化了10个或更多位置,但在GBD 2013中约为61%,在日本为59%。在本研究中排名前25的健康状态中,在GBD 2013中,归类为精神、行为和物质使用障碍的11种健康状态中有9种排名较低,在日本所有6种状态也排名较低,而在中国排名相似。
湖北居民的精神障碍负担,尤其是中度或重度重度抑郁症,值得进一步关注。在湖北省,使用不同的锚定方法时,残疾权重排名保持相对稳定,而不是绝对数值。我们的结果与中国、GBD 2013和日本的残疾权重排名存在显著差异,这凸显了为疾病负担计算得出本地残疾权重的必要性。