Yeoh Eng Kiong, Yam Carrie Ho Kwan, Ip Ethan Ming Yin, Chow Tsz Yu, Hung Chi Tim
The Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Dec 18;5(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00680-y.
In many Asian jurisdictions, patients are required to obtain referrals from registered doctors before consulting physiotherapists. In contrast, countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia have a direct access model for physiotherapists designed across different healthcare settings and under prescribed conditions. While research has demonstrated the benefits of direct access, issues remain on the appropriate policy design for direct access in the context of patient safety and organizational challenges in the implementation. Recently the policy to allow direct access in primary care context is being considered in Hong Kong. This study aims to examine the intervention design options for the policy of direct access to physiotherapists and identify corresponding implementation strategies, to inform the appropriate intervention design for direct access to physiotherapists and the implementation strategies.
We adopt a systematic process for developing the design of the policy and the implementation strategies using an Implementation Mapping approach informed by Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We will conduct literature reviews to understand the different aspects of policy intervention design and employ qualitative in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to understand key stakeholders' perspectives related to the direct access model. The identified barriers and facilitators associated with policy implementation of an acceptable intervention design will inform the development of an effective implementation strategy tailored to the implementation context. Our approach will involve mapping the research evidence and the subsequent findings from the stakeholders' deliberations into the CFIR domains and referencing the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) to develop the acceptable intervention characteristics and the corresponding implementation strategies. These insights will be further validated in a Delphi Expert Survey, for a consensus-based approach.
This study employs a sequential mixed-method approach to explore the intervention characteristics for an acceptable intervention design in the policy formulation and the corresponding implementation strategy for direct access to physiotherapists. Integrating research insights into actionable policy recommendations and refining these recommendations in a Delphi Survey will inform the appropriate policy intervention design and implementation strategy for direct access to physiotherapy services.
在许多亚洲司法管辖区,患者在咨询物理治疗师之前需要获得注册医生的转诊。相比之下,美国、英国和澳大利亚等国家为物理治疗师设计了直接就诊模式,适用于不同的医疗环境并在规定条件下实施。虽然研究已经证明了直接就诊的好处,但在患者安全和实施过程中的组织挑战背景下,直接就诊的适当政策设计仍存在问题。最近,香港正在考虑在基层医疗环境中允许直接就诊的政策。本研究旨在探讨物理治疗师直接就诊政策的干预设计选项,并确定相应的实施策略,以为物理治疗师直接就诊的适当干预设计和实施策略提供参考。
我们采用系统的流程,使用由实施研究综合框架(CFIR)提供信息的实施映射方法来制定政策设计和实施策略。我们将进行文献综述以了解政策干预设计的不同方面,并采用定性深入访谈和焦点小组讨论来了解关键利益相关者对直接就诊模式的看法。与可接受的干预设计政策实施相关联的已确定障碍和促进因素将为制定适合实施背景的有效实施策略提供参考。我们的方法将包括将研究证据以及利益相关者审议的后续结果映射到CFIR领域,并参考实施变革专家建议(ERIC)来制定可接受的干预特征和相应的实施策略。这些见解将在德尔菲专家调查中进一步验证,以采用基于共识的方法。
本研究采用顺序混合方法来探索政策制定中可接受干预设计的干预特征以及物理治疗师直接就诊的相应实施策略。将研究见解整合到可操作的政策建议中,并在德尔菲调查中完善这些建议,将为物理治疗服务直接就诊的适当政策干预设计和实施策略提供参考。