Cockcroft Emma, Bassi Vidhi, Mok Pearl L H, Adams Alex, Claro Anabel A, Trafford Alex M, Carr Matthew J, Ashcroft Darren M, Garavini Emma, Temple Rachel, Webb Roger T, Garg Shruti, Chew-Graham Carolyn A
Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
The McPin Foundation, London, UK.
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70131. doi: 10.1111/hex.70131.
Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is integral to health research. Reporting of PPIE methods and impact is becoming increasingly common in health research. However, reporting on PPIE in studies using large, routinely collected electronic health record data sets is less common. Anecdotal evidence suggests that involvement in this research context is more challenging and offers fewer opportunities for meaningful influence on the research process.
This paper reports the involvement approach for a Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) study and critically reflects on the process and impact of involving young people, parents and carers in research using this UK primary care electronic health record data set.
The CHOOSE study investigated mental health diagnoses of children and young people (1-24 years) during the COVID-19 pandemic using the CPRD. The study was informed by a Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP) which consisted of 13 members including 8 young people (13-25 years) with lived experience of mental health difficulties and 5 parents/carers, with involvement activities facilitated by project partners, mental health research charity, The McPin Foundation. We reflect on this process in this manuscript.
Key benefits of involving people with lived experience in this research included making sense of and contextualising findings and ensuring that they were focused on making a difference to young people's lives. Challenges included the fixed nature of the CPRD data, which did not capture all the information people with lived experience perceived to be important. Researchers expressed limited time for PPIE activities although that was compensated by McPin colleagues who organised and facilitated online meetings, and supported the young people, parents and carers during and between meetings.
This paper describes an approach to patient and public involvement in an electronic health record database study. Working collaboratively with young people, carers and other stakeholders requires sufficient time and adequate resources. We also highlight the importance of appropriate training and support and being transparent about the limitations of PPIE involvement.
Three members of the CHOOSE LEAP have been involved in conceptualising and writing this paper.
患者及公众参与和介入(PPIE)是健康研究不可或缺的一部分。在健康研究中,报告PPIE方法及影响正变得越来越普遍。然而,在使用大规模常规收集的电子健康记录数据集的研究中报告PPIE的情况则较少见。轶事证据表明,在这种研究背景下的参与更具挑战性,且对研究过程产生有意义影响的机会更少。
本文报告了一项临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)研究的参与方法,并批判性地反思了让年轻人、父母及照料者参与使用该英国初级保健电子健康记录数据集的研究过程及影响。
“选择”(CHOOSE)研究利用CPRD调查了新冠疫情期间儿童及青少年(1至24岁)的心理健康诊断情况。该研究由一个生活经验咨询小组(LEAP)提供指导,该小组由13名成员组成,包括8名有心理健康问题生活经验的年轻人(13至25岁)和5名父母/照料者,参与活动由项目合作伙伴、心理健康研究慈善机构麦克平基金会促成。我们在本手稿中反思了这一过程。
让有生活经验的人参与这项研究的主要益处包括理解研究结果并将其置于具体情境中,以及确保研究结果聚焦于对年轻人的生活产生影响。挑战包括CPRD数据的固定性质,它没有涵盖所有有生活经验的人认为重要的信息。研究人员表示用于PPIE活动的时间有限,不过麦克平基金会的同事组织并促成了线上会议,并在会议期间及会议间隔为年轻人、父母及照料者提供支持,弥补了这一不足。
本文描述了一种让患者及公众参与电子健康记录数据库研究的方法。与年轻人、照料者及其他利益相关者合作需要足够的时间和充足的资源。我们还强调了适当培训和支持以及对PPIE参与局限性保持透明的重要性。
“选择”研究LEAP的三名成员参与了本文的概念构思和撰写。