Shaban Eman E, Elgassim Mohamed, Shaban Ahmed, Shaban Amira, Ahmed Amina, Abdelraman Amro, Elgassim Moayad, Lloyd Stuart A, Zaki Hany A
Department of Cardiology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2024;12(4):149-161. doi: 10.30476/beat.2024.102206.1505.
The present study was performed to investigate the efficacy of different resuscitation fluids in critically ill patients presenting any type of hypovolemic shock.
We comprehensively searched PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for randomized trials published in English from January 1990 to August 2023. The risk of bias and methodological quality assessment was performed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool embedded within the Review Manager software (RevMan 5.4.1). Moreover, this software was used to perform all the statistical analyses in the present study. During these analyses, the random effects model and 95% confidence interval was employed. The overall effect sizes for continuous and dichotomous data were calculated using the Mean Difference (MD) and Risk ratio (RR), respectively.
Our initial database search resulted in 4768 articles, of which only 16 were reviewed and analyzed. A subgroup analysis of data from 4 of these studies showed that hydroxyethyl starches (HES), gelatins and albumins had no significant mortality benefit compared to crystalloids (RR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.75-1.17; P=0.58, RR: 0.71; 95% 0.46-1.08; P=0.11 and RR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.77-1.43; P=0.77, respectively). Similarly, a subgroup analysis of data from 9 studies showed that hypertonic saline plus dextran (HSD) had no significant mortality benefit over normal saline (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.62-1.13; P=0.24) or Lactated ringer's solution (RR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.75-1.42; P=0.87). In addition, we found that hypertonic saline had a similar effect on the overall mortality as isotonic crystalloids (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.68-1.25; P=0.60). Also, our analysis shows that modified fluid gelatins had a similar mortality effect as HES ((RR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.52-2.02; P=0.95).
Colloids, whether individually or in hypertonic crystalloids (HSD), had no mortality benefit over crystalloids in adult patients with hypovolemic shock.
本研究旨在探讨不同复苏液对出现任何类型低血容量性休克的危重症患者的疗效。
我们全面检索了PubMed、科学网、ScienceDirect、考克兰图书馆和谷歌学术,以查找1990年1月至2023年8月以英文发表的随机试验。使用Review Manager软件(RevMan 5.4.1)中嵌入的考克兰偏倚风险工具进行偏倚风险和方法学质量评估。此外,本研究使用该软件进行所有统计分析。在这些分析中,采用随机效应模型和95%置信区间。连续数据和二分数据的总体效应量分别使用平均差(MD)和风险比(RR)计算。
我们最初的数据库搜索得到4768篇文章,其中只有16篇进行了综述和分析。对其中4项研究的数据进行的亚组分析表明,与晶体液相比,羟乙基淀粉(HES)、明胶和白蛋白在降低死亡率方面无显著益处(RR:0.94;95%CI:0.75 - 1.17;P = 0.58,RR:0.71;95%CI:0.46 - 1.08;P = 0.11,RR:1.05;95%CI:0.77 - 1.43;P = 0.77)。同样,对9项研究的数据进行的亚组分析表明,高渗盐水加右旋糖酐(HSD)在降低死亡率方面并不比生理盐水(RR:0.84;95%CI:0.62 - 1.13;P = 0.24)或乳酸林格氏液(RR:1.03;95%CI:0.75 - 1.42;P = 0.87)更具显著益处。此外,我们发现高渗盐水对总体死亡率的影响与等渗晶体液相似(RR:0.92;95%CI:0.68 - 1.25;P = 0.60)。而且,我们的分析表明,改良液体明胶与HES对死亡率的影响相似(RR:1.02;95%CI:0.52 - 2.02;P = 0.95)。
对于低血容量性休克成年患者,胶体液无论是单独使用还是与高渗晶体液(HSD)联合使用,在降低死亡率方面并不比晶体液更具优势。