Otten Thomas M, Grimm Sabine E, Ramaekers Bram, Roth Alex, Emans Pieter, Boymans Tim, Janssen Maarten, Jeuken Ralph, Joore Manuela A
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA) Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht The Netherlands.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht The Netherlands.
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Dec 18;11(4):e70096. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70096. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the standard treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis. TKA is often used and, therefore, poses a healthcare and societal burden, which is likely to increase further. Headroom analyses evaluate a technology under development by making assumptions about its effectiveness. This article applies a headroom approach to forecast the potential value of innovations that improve TKA-related care in the Netherlands in terms of cost-effectiveness and surgeries avoided.
A state-transition model estimating lifetime direct health effects, healthcare- and societal costs and percentage of avoide d surgeries was developed. The model compared care as usual to five hypothetical interventions to calculate the headroom associated with (1) preventing the need for TKAs, (2) preventing the need for all TKA revisions, (3) postponing TKAs without quality-of-life loss, (4) preventing periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and (5) improving patient satisfaction.
Preventing the need for all TKAs amounted to €43,076 of headroom. Preventing the need for TKA revisions amounted to €2276 (5.8% of surgeries avoided), postponing TKAs by 5 years amounted to €7634 (32.4% of surgeries avoided), preventing PJIs amounted to €1187 (1.4% of surgeries avoided) and improving patient satisfaction amounted to €16,622 (0% of surgeries avoided). The headroom of each hypothetical intervention was highest in younger populations (<50 years of age).
There is a headroom for improving TKA-related care. Innovations to avoid or postpone TKA (i.e., joint-preserving treatments) as well as those that improve patient satisfaction can be effective in maximizing the value for money and avoiding surgeries. Due to the decreasing average patient age, innovations to reduce revision rates and PJIs will become more valuable as these are most effective in younger patients. It is currently unclear how cost-effectiveness considerations should be traded off against the prevention of surgery to reduce the increasing burden on the healthcare system.
Level III economic evaluation/decision-analytic model.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)是终末期骨关节炎的标准治疗方法。TKA应用广泛,因此带来了医疗和社会负担,且这种负担可能会进一步加重。净空间分析通过对一项正在研发的技术的有效性进行假设来评估该技术。本文采用净空间方法来预测在荷兰,在成本效益和避免手术方面改善TKA相关护理的创新的潜在价值。
开发了一个状态转换模型,用于估计终生直接健康影响、医疗和社会成本以及避免手术的百分比。该模型将常规护理与五种假设干预措施进行比较,以计算与以下方面相关的净空间:(1)避免进行TKA的需求;(2)避免所有TKA翻修的需求;(3)推迟TKA且不降低生活质量;(4)预防假体周围关节感染(PJI);(5)提高患者满意度。
避免所有TKA的需求所产生的净空间为43,076欧元。避免TKA翻修的需求所产生的净空间为2276欧元(占避免手术的5.8%),将TKA推迟5年所产生的净空间为7634欧元(占避免手术的32.4%),预防PJI所产生的净空间为1187欧元(占避免手术的1.4%),提高患者满意度所产生的净空间为16,622欧元(占避免手术的0%)。每种假设干预措施的净空间在较年轻人群(<50岁)中最高。
改善TKA相关护理存在净空间。避免或推迟TKA的创新措施(即保留关节的治疗方法)以及提高患者满意度的创新措施在实现性价比最大化和避免手术方面可能是有效的。由于患者平均年龄的下降,降低翻修率和PJI的创新措施将变得更有价值,因为这些措施在年轻患者中最为有效。目前尚不清楚在成本效益考量与预防手术以减轻医疗系统日益增加的负担之间应如何权衡。
III级经济评估/决策分析模型。