Suppr超能文献

不同活化冲洗液对根管内玷污层去除效果的体外研究

The effect of different activation irrigations on intracanal smear layer removal: a vitro study.

作者信息

Wang Lingxiang, Feng Bo, Shi Shaojing, Sun Degang, Wu Di

机构信息

Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Qingdao Stomatological Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Dec 4;12:1507525. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1507525. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of syringe irrigation technique, passive ultrasonic activation technique, EDDY activation technique and Er,Cr,YSGG laser activation technique on smear layer removal in root canals .

METHODS

Forty mandibular first premolars with single canal were collected from patients in Qingdao Stomatological Hospital affiliated to Qingdao University. After root canal preparation with ProTaper Universal to F3, they were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10) according to different activation irrigations for the final washing: syringe irrigation (SI), passive ultrasonic activation (PU), EDDY activation (EDDY) and Er,Cr,YSGG laser activation (YSGG). Finally, all the crowns of them were cut off and the root length was trimmed to 15 mm. The roots were split longitudinally and observed with scanning electron microscope (SEM) for assessment of smear layer removal in different parts of the root canal.

RESULTS

All groups showed similar effects for cleaning the root canals in the coronal thirds (P > 0.05). For cleaning the root canals in the middle thirds, PU group, EDDY group and YSGG group showed similar effects, (P> 0.05). They were more effective than SI group (P < 0.05). For cleaning the root canals in the apical thirds, PU group and EDDY group showed similar effects (P> 0.05). They were more effective than SI group (P < 0.05). YSGG group was more effective than other groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Er,Cr,YSGG laser activation technique can remove smear layer of root canals effectively. The cleaning effect of the passive ultrasonic activation technique, EDDY activation technique is better than that of syringe irrigation technique.

摘要

目的

比较注射器冲洗技术、被动超声激活技术、EDDY激活技术和Er,Cr,YSGG激光激活技术对根管内玷污层去除的效果。

方法

收集青岛大学附属青岛口腔医院患者的40颗单根管下颌第一前磨牙。用ProTaper Universal预备根管至F3后,根据最终冲洗时不同的激活冲洗方式将其随机分为四组(n = 10):注射器冲洗(SI)、被动超声激活(PU)、EDDY激活(EDDY)和Er,Cr,YSGG激光激活(YSGG)。最后,将所有牙冠截断,牙根长度修剪至15 mm。将牙根纵劈,用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察,评估根管不同部位玷污层的去除情况。

结果

所有组在根管冠方三分之一的清洁效果相似(P > 0.05)。在根管中三分之一的清洁方面,PU组、EDDY组和YSGG组效果相似(P> 0.05),它们比SI组更有效(P < 0.05)。在根管根尖三分之一的清洁方面,PU组和EDDY组效果相似(P> 0.05),它们比SI组更有效(P < 0.05)。YSGG组比其他组更有效(P < 0.05)。

结论

Er,Cr,YSGG激光激活技术能有效去除根管内的玷污层。被动超声激活技术、EDDY激活技术的清洁效果优于注射器冲洗技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ad/11653418/4dfb9bcabd4f/fbioe-12-1507525-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验