• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较粗针穿刺活检与手术切除在乳腺癌诊断中的应用:一项回顾性队列研究对临床实践的启示

Comparing core needle biopsy and surgical excision in breast cancer diagnosis: implications for clinical practice from a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Tian Hongtian, Li Guoqiu, Zheng Jing, Ding Zhimin, Luo Yuwei, Mai Simin, Hu Jintao, Huang Zhibin, Xu Jinfeng, Wu Huaiyu, Dong Fajin

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University), Shenzhen, China.

Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University), Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):8281-8293. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-198. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

DOI:10.21037/qims-24-198
PMID:39698620
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11652020/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preoperative ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) is currently the standard procedure for managing breast illnesses. However, the differences in outcomes between CNB and surgical excision (SE) have not been thoroughly assessed. This study aimed to explore the disparities in pathological outcomes between these two procedures, using a large sample dataset.

METHODS

This retrospective study consecutively included patients who underwent CNB and SE at Shenzhen People's Hospital from May 2016 to June 2023. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was utilized to determine the status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), and Ki-67. Patients presenting with HER2 IHC 2+ underwent additional fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) examination. The cutoff value for high Ki-67 expression was established at 14%. Molecular subtypes were classified into four groups (Luminal A, Luminal B, Triple-negative, and HER2-positive) and five groups [Luminal A, Luminal B+ (HER2-positive), Luminal B- (HER2-negative), Triple-negative, and HER2-positive], based on different criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 4,209 patients were included in this study. Post-surgical confirmation revealed 2,410 cases as benign and 1,799 as malignant. Among the malignant cases, 334 were excluded due to either not having undergone direct surgery or having incomplete IHC results. The remaining 1,465 cases underwent IHC testing. CNB demonstrated a 97% concordance rate (CR) in diagnosing benign cases. The CRs for diagnosing invasive breast cancer (IBC) and carcinoma in situ (CIS) were 92% and 54%, respectively. ER, PgR, HER2, and Ki-67 exhibited CRs of 94%, 91%, 98%, and 84%, respectively. In the four-group classification, the overall diagnostic CR was 82%, with CRs for Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-positive, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) being 84%, 82%, 78%, and 85%, respectively. Under the five-group classification, the overall diagnostic CR was also 82%, with CRs for Luminal A, Luminal B+, Luminal B-, HER2-positive, and TNBC being 86%, 85%, 94%, 88%, and 92%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that CNB is highly accurate in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions, particularly showing significant consistency in the diagnosis of molecular subtypes, providing a reliable reference for clinical diagnosis.

摘要

背景

术前超声引导下的核心针穿刺活检(CNB)是目前处理乳腺疾病的标准程序。然而,CNB与手术切除(SE)之间的结果差异尚未得到充分评估。本研究旨在使用大型样本数据集探索这两种操作在病理结果上的差异。

方法

这项回顾性研究连续纳入了2016年5月至2023年6月在深圳市人民医院接受CNB和SE的患者。采用免疫组织化学(IHC)来确定雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PgR)、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)和Ki-67的状态。HER2 IHC 2+的患者接受了额外的荧光原位杂交(FISH)检查。高Ki-67表达的临界值设定为14%。根据不同标准,分子亚型分为四组(Luminal A、Luminal B、三阴性和HER2阳性)和五组[Luminal A、Luminal B+(HER2阳性)、Luminal B-(HER2阴性)、三阴性和HER2阳性]。

结果

本研究共纳入4209例患者。术后确诊2410例为良性,1799例为恶性。在恶性病例中,334例因未接受直接手术或免疫组化结果不完整而被排除。其余1465例进行了免疫组化检测。CNB在诊断良性病例方面的符合率(CR)为97%。诊断浸润性乳腺癌(IBC)和原位癌(CIS)的CR分别为92%和54%。ER、PgR、HER2和Ki-67的CR分别为94%、91%、98%和84%。在四组分类中,总体诊断CR为82%,Luminal A、Luminal B、HER2阳性和三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的CR分别为84%、82%、78%和85%。在五组分类下,总体诊断CR也为82%,Luminal A、Luminal B+、Luminal B-、HER2阳性和TNBC的CR分别为86%、85%、94%、88%和92%。

结论

本研究表明,CNB在区分乳腺良性和恶性病变方面高度准确,尤其是在分子亚型诊断方面显示出显著的一致性,为临床诊断提供了可靠的参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fe/11652020/70d2fcd7c095/qims-14-12-8281-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fe/11652020/f653aaa9e5f1/qims-14-12-8281-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fe/11652020/532010f78fa2/qims-14-12-8281-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fe/11652020/0a674119f839/qims-14-12-8281-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fe/11652020/5f86ced86255/qims-14-12-8281-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fe/11652020/945782d02be6/qims-14-12-8281-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fe/11652020/70d2fcd7c095/qims-14-12-8281-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fe/11652020/f653aaa9e5f1/qims-14-12-8281-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fe/11652020/532010f78fa2/qims-14-12-8281-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fe/11652020/0a674119f839/qims-14-12-8281-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fe/11652020/5f86ced86255/qims-14-12-8281-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fe/11652020/945782d02be6/qims-14-12-8281-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5fe/11652020/70d2fcd7c095/qims-14-12-8281-f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing core needle biopsy and surgical excision in breast cancer diagnosis: implications for clinical practice from a retrospective cohort study.比较粗针穿刺活检与手术切除在乳腺癌诊断中的应用:一项回顾性队列研究对临床实践的启示
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):8281-8293. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-198. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
2
Preoperative core needle biopsy is accurate in determining molecular subtypes in invasive breast cancer.术前核心针活检可准确确定浸润性乳腺癌的分子亚型。
BMC Cancer. 2013 Aug 19;13:390. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-390.
3
Hormone and HER2-receptor status in breast cancer: determination using sonographically guided core needle biopsy and correlation with excision specimen-a German single institution diagnostic accuracy study.乳腺癌中的激素和HER2受体状态:使用超声引导下的粗针活检进行测定及其与切除标本的相关性——一项德国单机构诊断准确性研究
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Mar;311(3):881-891. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07920-5. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
4
Expression and Subtype Discordance Between Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimen in Breast Cancer.乳腺癌粗针活检与手术标本之间的表达及亚型不一致性
J Surg Res. 2025 Mar;307:42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.01.010. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
5
Accuracy of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status between core needle and open excision biopsy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.乳腺癌中核心针和开放切除活检之间的雌激素受体、孕激素受体和 HER2 状态的准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Aug;134(3):957-67. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-1990-z. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
6
Analysis of the molecular subtypes of preoperative core needle biopsy and surgical specimens in invasive breast cancer.浸润性乳腺癌术前粗针穿刺活检和手术标本分子亚型分析
J Pathol Transl Med. 2020 Jan;54(1):87-94. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2019.10.14. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
7
Impact of molecular subtypes classification concordance between preoperative core needle biopsy and surgical specimen on early breast cancer management: Single-institution experience and review of published literature.术前粗针穿刺活检与手术标本分子亚型分类一致性对早期乳腺癌治疗的影响:单机构经验及已发表文献综述
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;43(4):642-648. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.025. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
8
Hormone receptor and HER2 assessment in breast carcinoma metastatic to bone: A comparison between FNA cell blocks and decalcified core needle biopsies.激素受体和 HER2 在乳腺癌骨转移中的评估:细针抽吸细胞块与脱钙芯针活检的比较。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2020 Feb;128(2):133-145. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22226. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
9
Impact of host and histopathological factors on the discrepancies in estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor, and HER2 status between core needle biopsy and surgically excised tumors.宿主和组织病理学因素对粗针活检与手术切除肿瘤之间雌激素受体、孕激素受体及人表皮生长因子受体2状态差异的影响。
Breast. 2016 Apr;26:141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
10
Concordance between core needle biopsy and surgical excision for breast cancer tumor grade and biomarkers.核心针穿刺活检与手术切除在乳腺癌肿瘤分级和生物标志物方面的一致性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 May;193(1):151-159. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06548-w. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technique and initial outcomes.对比增强乳腺钼靶引导活检:技术与初步结果。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Aug 1;13(8):5349-5354. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-137. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
2
The comparison of efficacy and safety evaluation of vacuum-assisted Elite 10-G system and the traditional BARD 14-G core needle in breast diagnosis: an open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial.真空辅助 Elite 10-G 系统与传统 BARD 14-G 核心针在乳腺诊断中的疗效和安全性评价比较:一项开放标签、平行、随机对照试验。
Int J Surg. 2023 May 1;109(5):1180-1187. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000257.
3
Eliminating breast surgery for invasive breast cancer in exceptional responders to neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.
新辅助全身治疗中极少数有显著缓解的浸润性乳腺癌患者免除乳房切除术:一项多中心、单臂、2 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Dec;23(12):1517-1524. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00613-1. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
4
Concordance between core needle biopsy and surgical excision for breast cancer tumor grade and biomarkers.核心针穿刺活检与手术切除在乳腺癌肿瘤分级和生物标志物方面的一致性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 May;193(1):151-159. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06548-w. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
5
MRI-guided Breast Biopsy Case-based Review: Essential Techniques and Approaches to Challenging Cases.MRI 引导下乳腺活检病例分析:疑难病例的基本技术和处理方法。
Radiographics. 2022 Mar-Apr;42(2):E46-E47. doi: 10.1148/rg.210126. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
6
Cancer statistics, 2022.癌症统计数据,2022 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
7
Targeting HER2 heterogeneity in breast cancer.针对乳腺癌中的 HER2 异质性。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2021 Nov;100:102286. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102286. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
8
Pathologic response of ductal carcinoma in situ to neoadjuvant systemic treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer.HER2 阳性乳腺癌新辅助全身治疗中导管原位癌的病理反应。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Aug;189(1):213-224. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06235-2. Epub 2021 May 4.
9
Pyrotinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (PHOEBE): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.吡咯替尼联合卡培他滨对比拉帕替尼联合卡培他滨治疗人表皮生长因子受体 2 阳性转移性乳腺癌(PHOEBE):一项多中心、开放标签、随机、对照、Ⅲ期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Mar;22(3):351-360. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30702-6. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
10
Discrepancies between radiological and histological findings in preoperative core needle (CNB) and vacuum-assisted (VAB) breast biopsies.术前空心针(CNB)和真空辅助(VAB)乳腺活检的影像学和组织学检查结果差异。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar;147(3):749-754. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03481-7. Epub 2020 Dec 7.