Suppr超能文献

创伤性嗅觉障碍患者主观嗅觉功能障碍的特征及影像学表现:一项回顾性病例对照研究。

Characteristics of subjective olfactory dysfunction and imaging features in patients with traumatic olfactory disorders: a retrospective case-control study.

作者信息

Su Baihan, Gao Xing, Lin Peng, Wang Wei, Zhang Guimin, Yue Zhenzhong, Zhang Yonglan, Shi Yanan, Wu Dawei

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Institute of Otolaryngology of Tianjin, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):9335-9346. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1185. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Olfactory dysfunction caused by head trauma poses significant challenges in clinical diagnosis and treatment. The primary difficulty arises from direct injuries to olfactory-related brain tissues. Although imaging provides the most direct method to evaluate such injuries, there is no standardized international diagnostic criterion for olfactory dysfunction based on imaging. We designed this study to compare the subjective olfactory function differences and brain gray-matter (GM) and white-matter (WM) volume differences between patients with traumatic olfactory dysfunction and those with other types of olfactory dysfunction and to determine the characteristics of subjective olfactory dysfunction and imaging features in patients with traumatic olfactory disorders. The findings of this study can provide a theoretical basis for the diagnosis of traumatic olfactory disorders.

METHODS

This ethics committee-approved, retrospective case-control study included 56 patients with traumatic olfactory dysfunction (trauma group) and 45 patients with other types of olfactory dysfunction (e.g., postinfection, nasal inflammation, idiopathic disease). The "Sniffin' Sticks" olfactory function test was used to analyze the subjective olfactory function differences between the two groups, and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was used to compare the GM volume (GMV) and WM volume (WMV) of brain regions between the two groups.

RESULTS

(I) There was no statistical difference in age distribution between the trauma group (41.55±11.77 years) and the control group (38.87±14.37 years; P>0.05). (II) The trauma group had significantly lower total scores and subtest scores on the Sniffin' Sticks olfactory test compared to the control group [odor threshold test (OT): 1.04±0.33 1.67±1.42; odor discrimination test (OD): 2.93±2.25 5.42±3.66; odor identification test (OI): 2.77±1.94 6.71±3.55; total scores: 6.74±3.91 13.81±7.63; all P values <0.05]. (III) Compared with the control group, the trauma group had significantly reduced GMV and WMV in the bilateral orbitofrontal cortex, bilateral anterior cingulate gyrus, bilateral cingulate gyrus, bilateral rectus gyrus, bilateral olfactory cortex, right superior frontal gyrus, bilateral insula, bilateral caudate nucleus, and bilateral thalamus [P<0.05]. (IV) There was a significant positive correlation between the odor identification function scores and GMV in certain brain regions (P<0.05), and the GMV in these regions was reduced in the trauma group compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to patients with other types of olfactory dysfunction, patients with traumatic olfactory dysfunction have poorer subjective olfactory functions and more severe damage to olfactory-related brain regions, including the bilateral orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate gyrus, cingulate gyrus, rectus gyrus, insula, and olfactory cortex. The olfactory nerve damage in these brain regions can be used as a basis for the diagnosis of traumatic olfactory disorders.

摘要

背景

头部外伤所致嗅觉功能障碍在临床诊断和治疗方面面临重大挑战。主要困难源于嗅觉相关脑组织的直接损伤。尽管影像学检查是评估此类损伤最直接的方法,但目前尚无基于影像学的国际标准化嗅觉功能障碍诊断标准。我们开展本研究旨在比较创伤性嗅觉功能障碍患者与其他类型嗅觉功能障碍患者的主观嗅觉功能差异以及脑灰质(GM)和白质(WM)体积差异,以确定创伤性嗅觉障碍患者主观嗅觉功能障碍的特征及影像学特点。本研究结果可为创伤性嗅觉障碍的诊断提供理论依据。

方法

本项经伦理委员会批准的回顾性病例对照研究纳入了56例创伤性嗅觉功能障碍患者(创伤组)和45例其他类型嗅觉功能障碍患者(如感染后、鼻炎症、特发性疾病)。采用“嗅觉棒”嗅觉功能测试分析两组间主观嗅觉功能差异,运用基于体素的形态学测量(VBM)比较两组脑区的GM体积(GMV)和WM体积(WMV)。

结果

(I)创伤组(41.55±11.77岁)与对照组(38.87±14.37岁;P>0.05)年龄分布无统计学差异。(II)与对照组相比,创伤组在“嗅觉棒”嗅觉测试中的总分及各子测试得分显著更低[气味阈值测试(OT):1.04±0.33对1.67±1.42;气味辨别测试(OD):2.93±2.25对5.42±3.66;气味识别测试(OI):2.77±1.94对6.71±3.55;总分:6.74±3.9对13.81±7.63;所有P值<0.05]。(III)与对照组相比,创伤组双侧眶额皮质、双侧前扣带回、双侧扣带回、双侧直回、双侧嗅觉皮质、右侧额上回、双侧岛叶、双侧尾状核及双侧丘脑的GMV和WMV显著降低[P<0.05]。(IV)某些脑区的气味识别功能得分与GMV之间存在显著正相关(P<0.05),且创伤组这些脑区的GMV低于对照组。

结论

与其他类型嗅觉功能障碍患者相比,创伤性嗅觉功能障碍患者的主观嗅觉功能更差,嗅觉相关脑区(包括双侧眶额皮质、前扣带回、扣带回、直回、岛叶和嗅觉皮质)的损伤更严重。这些脑区的嗅觉神经损伤可作为创伤性嗅觉障碍诊断依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3268/11651931/c3e5c557c5d1/qims-14-12-9335-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验