Comparison of silent MRA and time-of-flight MRA in the depiction and grading of brain arteriovenous malformations.

BACKGROUND

Preliminary small-sample studies suggest that silent magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has an advantage over time-of-flight MRA (TOF MRA) in the characterization of brain arteriovenous malformation (BAVM), but did not examine whether the imaging performance of silent MRA was affected by the intrinsic features of BAVM or common clinical factors. This study sought to compare silent MRA and TOF MRA in terms of the visualization and grading of BAVMs in various clinical settings.

METHODS

In total, 85 participants (50 males, 35 females; mean age: 33.5±15.2 years) with BAVM who underwent both silent MRA and TOF MRA using a 3 Tesla (3T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system were consecutively recruited from the Capital Medical University Xuanwu Hospital between April 2020 and October 2022 to participate in this cross-sectional retrospective study. The patients were divided into subgroups according to new hemorrhage presentation, embolization, size, and nidus compactness. Image quality scoring on a 4-point scale, and the accuracy of characteristic visulization and Spetzler-Martin grading were compared between the two MRA techniques and each MRA subgroup using the rank-sum Wilcoxon test and Fisher's exact test with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard. A multivariable chi-square test was used to examine the interactions between the grouping factors. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The average image quality scores were significantly higher for silent MRA than those for TOF MRA overall (2.83±0.42 versus 2.46±0.66, P<0.001) and in each subgroup (P<0.05). For silent MRA, the average image quality score for BAVM in each subgroup did not differ significantly (P>0.05). For TOF MRA, the image quality scores for the new hemorrhage, small nidus, and diffuse nidus groups was significantly reduced (P=0.001, <0.001, and 0.037, respectively). The accuracy of silent MRA was significantly better than that of TOF MRA in terms of nidus size and Spetzler-Martin grading (P<0.001), but did not differ significantly in terms of deep venous drainage and associated aneurysm (P=0.402, 0.098, respectively). In relation to silent MRA, the image quality, detection of BAVM characteristics, and grading were similar across the new hemorrhage, embolization, size, and compactness subgroups (P=0.066-0.959). In relation to TOF MRA, the accuracy of nidus size grading was significantly lower in the medium-size subgroup than the small-size subgroup (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Silent MRA performed well in imaging BAVM, and high performance in determining nidus size and Spetzler-Martin grading, but its ability to detect deep venous drainage was limited.