Zou He, Jiang Yiqiu, Huang Haorui, Elkoumy Ahmed, Wang Xiaodong, Zhu Jinyun, Shen Youxian, Zhang Xinmin, Lunadi Mattia, Soliman Osama, Wu Lianpin, Wu Xinlei
Zhejiang-Ireland Joint Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Valvular Heart Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Department of Cardiology, Key Laboratory of Panvascular Diseases of Wenzhou, School of the Second Clinical Medical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):8414-8428. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-650. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
Accurate assessment of aortic root is crucial for the preprocedural planning of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). A variety software is emerging for the semiautomated or automated measurements during TAVR planning. This study evaluated a new deep-learning (DL) tool based on cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for fully automatic assessment of aortic root.
The study included 126 patients with CCTA, 63 of whom underwent TAVR. In the overall population, the DL method was compared to manual measurements of the annulus dimensions. Within the TAVR group, the DL method was also compared to 3mensio software-derived aortic root measure, including the annulus, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), sinotubular junction (STJ), ascending aorta (AAo), and the heights of both the coronary ostia.
Data were successfully analyzed using the DL method in 122 (96.8%) of patients. The correlation of annular diameters between the DL and manual methods was good to excellent for the overall cohort (n=118; r=0.83), the TAVR group (n=59, r=0.86), and its subgroups [bicuspid aortic valve (BAV): n=12, r=0.74; tricuspid aortic valve (TAV): n=47, r=0.93]. In the comparison of the DL method with 3mensio, the highest correlation was found for AAo (r=0.99). Among the four diameter indices [minimum, maximum, perimeter-derived diameter (pDD), and area-derived diameter (aDD)], excellent correlation was observed for aDD (LVOT: r=0.92; annulus: r=0.89).
The DL method offers an effective and efficient tool for the quantification of aortic roots for TAVR planning.
准确评估主动脉根部对于经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的术前规划至关重要。在TAVR规划期间,各种软件正在兴起,用于半自动或自动测量。本研究评估了一种基于心脏计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)的新型深度学习(DL)工具,用于主动脉根部的全自动评估。
该研究纳入了126例接受CCTA检查的患者,其中63例接受了TAVR。在总体人群中,将DL方法与瓣环尺寸的手动测量进行比较。在TAVR组中,DL方法还与3mensio软件得出的主动脉根部测量值进行比较,包括瓣环、左心室流出道(LVOT)、窦管交界(STJ)、升主动脉(AAo)以及两个冠状动脉开口的高度。
122例(96.8%)患者的数据使用DL方法成功分析。DL方法与手动方法之间的瓣环直径相关性在总体队列(n = 118;r = 0.83)、TAVR组(n = 59,r = 0.86)及其亚组[二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV):n = 12,r = 0.74;三叶式主动脉瓣(TAV):n = 47,r = 0.93]中良好至极佳。在DL方法与3mensio的比较中,AAo的相关性最高(r = 0.99)。在四个直径指标[最小值、最大值、周长衍生直径(pDD)和面积衍生直径(aDD)]中,aDD的相关性极佳(LVOT:r = 0.92;瓣环:r = 0.89)。
DL方法为TAVR规划中主动脉根部的量化提供了一种有效且高效的工具。