Machado Daniel Gonçalves, Silva Daniella de Oliveira da, Gurgel Júlio de Araújo, Mendonça Raphael Dutra de Resende, Cotrin Paula, Freitas Karina Maria Salvatore, Valarelli Fabrício Pinelli, Pinzan-Vercelino Célia Regina Maio
Ceuma University, School of Dentistry (São Luís/MA, Brazil).
State University of São Paulo, School of Dentistry (Marília/SP, Brazil).
Dental Press J Orthod. 2024 Dec 16;29(6):e2423251. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.6.e2423251.oar. eCollection 2024.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the orthodontic retention protocols used by Brazilian orthodontists.
This cross-sectional study included 693 orthodontists who answered a web-based questionnaire with 22 questions regarding the participants' characteristics, their retainers' prescriptions, follow-up duration, and appliance fabrication.
A 20.84% response rate was recorded. Most orthodontists reported working in private dental offices (94.7%), and female practitioners comprised 59.9% of the respondents. The mean age of the orthodontists was 41.05 years, and the mean time practicing as an orthodontist was 11.28 years. For the maxillary arch, most orthodontists (57.9%) declared to use the Hawley retainer, and for the mandibular arch, 49.1% use the bonded retainer. Regarding the retention phase duration, 85.6% recommend using a permanent retainer for the mandibular arch; and for the maxillary arch, 36.2% recommended using it for 1 to 2 years. The main reason that led orthodontists to choose a retention design was related to the initial malocclusion characteristics (72.9%), and the most mentioned explanation for choosing the retainer type and protocol was clinical experience (44.5%). Most orthodontists (85.3%) would like to have access to general guidelines/protocols for retention procedures after orthodontic treatment.
According to the answers, retention protocols varied among Brazilian orthodontists. Brazilian orthodontists preferred to use a Hawley retainer in the maxillary arch and a fixed straight retention bonded from canine to canine (3x3) in the mandibular arch.
本研究旨在评估巴西正畸医生使用的正畸保持方案。
这项横断面研究纳入了693名正畸医生,他们通过网络问卷回答了22个问题,内容涉及参与者的特征、保持器的处方、随访时长以及矫治器制作情况。
记录的回复率为20.84%。大多数正畸医生报告在私人牙科诊所工作(94.7%),女性从业者占受访者的59.9%。正畸医生的平均年龄为41.05岁,正畸医生的平均从业时间为11.28年。在上颌弓方面,大多数正畸医生(57.9%)宣称使用霍利保持器,在下颌弓方面,49.1%使用粘结保持器。关于保持阶段的时长,85.6%的人建议在下颌弓使用永久性保持器;在上颌弓方面,36.2%的人建议使用1至2年。导致正畸医生选择保持设计的主要原因与初始错牙合特征有关(72.9%),而选择保持器类型和方案时最常提到的理由是临床经验(44.5%)。大多数正畸医生(85.3%)希望能获取正畸治疗后保持程序的一般指南/方案。
根据回答,巴西正畸医生的保持方案各不相同。巴西正畸医生更喜欢在上颌弓使用霍利保持器,在下颌弓使用从尖牙到尖牙粘结固定的直丝保持器(3×3)。