• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生态驱动因素的变化影响着喜马拉雅中部森林中树木和土壤碳动态的响应。

Shifts in the ecological drivers influence the response of tree and soil carbon dynamics in central Himalayan forests.

作者信息

Shankar Anand, Chandra Garkoti Satish

机构信息

School of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2025 Jan;373:123755. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123755. Epub 2024 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123755
PMID:39700932
Abstract

Understanding and regulating global carbon relies crucially on comprehending the components and services of forest ecosystems. In particular, interactions that govern carbon storage in trees, soil, and microbes, driven by factors like vegetation structure, function, and soil characteristics, remain poorly understood, especially in the central Himalayas. To address this gap, we investigated carbon storage in tree aboveground biomass, root biomass, and soil across different vegetation types. We also examined how vegetation parameters {vegetation diversity (H'), diameter at breast height (DBH), basal area (BA), and biomass}, and soil characteristics {bulk density (BD), moisture (M), pH, and total nitrogen (N)} might influence forest carbon storage. Our study, based on 14 plots (0.1 ha each) spanning four distinct vegetation types {Sal forest (SF, 3), Chir-pine forest (PF, 4), Nepalese-alder forest (AF, 3), and Banj-oak forest (OF, 4)} in the central Himalaya, revealed several key insights. Tree carbon storage ranged from ∼79 to 261 Mg C ha, accounting for 41-65% of forest carbon storage, while soil carbon storage ranged from ∼28 to 69 Mg C ha, contributing 35-58%. These values varied with vegetation types and were influenced by the vegetation and soil characteristics associated with each forest type. Important contributors to tree and soil carbon storage included soil M, N, and vegetation structural diversity (H', BA), explaining 8-64 % of the variation. Path analysis indicated that increased vegetation diversity, soil properties, and conservative traits (fine roots and leaves) strongly influence tree and soil carbon storage. The study highlights the potential complex system to optimizing carbon storage in natural forest ecosystems, offering valuable insight for managing carbon sinks. Further research is needed to fully understand ecosystem responses to carbon storage across different forest habitats and different spatial-temporal scales.

摘要

了解和调节全球碳循环关键取决于对森林生态系统的组成部分及其服务功能的理解。特别是,由植被结构、功能和土壤特性等因素驱动的树木、土壤和微生物中碳储存的相互作用,目前仍知之甚少,尤其是在喜马拉雅山脉中部地区。为了填补这一空白,我们调查了不同植被类型中树木地上生物量、根系生物量和土壤中的碳储存情况。我们还研究了植被参数{植被多样性(H')、胸径(DBH)、断面积(BA)和生物量}以及土壤特性{容重(BD)、湿度(M)、pH值和总氮(N)}如何影响森林碳储存。我们的研究基于喜马拉雅山脉中部14个样地(每个样地0.1公顷),涵盖四种不同的植被类型{娑罗双树林(SF,3个样地)、喜马拉雅长叶松林(PF,4个样地)、尼泊尔桤木林(AF,3个样地)和高山栎林(OF,4个样地)},得出了几个关键结论。树木碳储量在79至261 Mg C/公顷之间,占森林碳储量的41 - 65%,而土壤碳储量在28至69 Mg C/公顷之间,占35 - 58%。这些数值因植被类型而异,并受与每种森林类型相关的植被和土壤特性的影响。树木和土壤碳储存的重要贡献因素包括土壤湿度、氮含量以及植被结构多样性(H'、BA),解释了8 - 64%的变化。路径分析表明,植被多样性增加、土壤性质以及保守性状(细根和树叶)对树木和土壤碳储存有强烈影响。该研究强调了优化天然森林生态系统中碳储存的潜在复杂系统,为管理碳汇提供了有价值的见解。需要进一步研究以全面了解不同森林栖息地和不同时空尺度下生态系统对碳储存的响应。

相似文献

1
Shifts in the ecological drivers influence the response of tree and soil carbon dynamics in central Himalayan forests.生态驱动因素的变化影响着喜马拉雅中部森林中树木和土壤碳动态的响应。
J Environ Manage. 2025 Jan;373:123755. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123755. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
2
Influence of vegetation and soil properties on carbon stocks in Shorea robusta forests under different disturbance regimes.不同干扰状况下植被和土壤特性对娑罗双树林碳储量的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2025 Apr;380:124916. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124916. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
3
Influence of forest types on soil physicochemical and biological characteristics of associated agroecosystems in the central Himalaya.喜马拉雅山脉中部森林类型对相关农业生态系统土壤理化和生物学特性的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 1;906:167731. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167731. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
4
Variation of biomass and carbon pools with forest type in temperate forests of Kashmir Himalaya, India.印度克什米尔喜马拉雅山脉温带森林中生物量和碳库随森林类型的变化。
Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Feb;187(2):55. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4299-7. Epub 2015 Feb 1.
5
Ecosystem carbon stocks and sequestration rates in white oak forests in the central Himalaya: Role of nitrogen-fixing Nepalese alder.喜马拉雅山脉中部白栎林的生态系统碳储量和固碳率:固氮尼泊尔桤木的作用。
J Biosci. 2023;48.
6
Large-scale carbon stock assessment of woody vegetation in tropical dry deciduous forest of Sathanur reserve forest, Eastern Ghats, India.印度东高止山脉萨塔努尔保留林热带干燥落叶林中木本植被的大规模碳储量评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Apr;189(4):187. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-5899-1. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
7
Soil nutrients, forest structure and species traits drive aboveground carbon dynamics in an old-growth temperate forest.土壤养分、森林结构和物种特征驱动着老龄温带森林地上碳动态。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Feb 25;705:135874. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135874. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
8
Dynamics of soil bio-physicochemical properties under different disturbance regimes in sal forests in western Himalaya, India.印度西喜马拉雅地区盐森林不同干扰状况下土壤生物物理化学性质的动态变化
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jun 25;879:163050. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163050. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
9
Functional Diversity Explains Ecosystem Carbon Storage in Subtropical Forests.功能多样性解释了亚热带森林生态系统的碳储存。
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 Mar;31(3):e70120. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70120.
10
Tree diversity, biomass and carbon storage in sacred groves of Central India.印度中部圣林的树种多样性、生物量和碳储量。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Dec;26(36):37212-37227. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06854-9. Epub 2019 Nov 20.