• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2019年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准评分可预测未来狼疮患者的住院情况及费用。

2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE score predicts future lupus hospital admission and costs.

作者信息

Suman Saurav, Ali Hammad, Buechler Connor R, Rogers Heidi C, Roberts W Neal

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Penn State University, Hershey, PA, USA.

Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Lupus. 2025 Feb;34(2):178-180. doi: 10.1177/09612033241310071. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

DOI:10.1177/09612033241310071
PMID:39701604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11780967/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the ability of the 2019 EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria for SLE score to predict lupus related hospitalization and overall cost of hospitalization.

METHODS

217 University of Kentucky patient records that met our preliminary inclusion criteria, 44 patients were selected by a random number generator algorithm for a thorough chart review to collect data needed for calculation of the 2019 EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria for SLE score. Total hospitalization cost was calculated by using hospital adjusted expenses per inpatient day data, which estimates the expense incurred by the hospital to provide services and thus removes the variability of charges and reimbursements introduced by insurance type.

RESULTS

Patients with a score of 19 or more had increased risk of hospitalization in at least the 6 months after initial outpatient visit as compared to their counterparts with scores less than 19 [= .069]. The odds of being hospitalized for lupus among those with initial score ≥19 was 5.71 times higher than for those with score <19. Patients who scored 19 or less at initial visit had a mean hospitalization cost of $14,499, whereas those scored >19 had mean hospitalization cost of $28,725.

CONCLUSION

This study adds to the growing evidence that 2019 EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria score for SLE can be used as a surrogate marker to assess disease severity. The weighted 2019 EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria for SLE score offers a promising tool beyond its primary objective to find true lupus cases for research and clinical trials.

摘要

目的

检验2019年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会(EULAR/ACR)系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)分类标准评分预测狼疮相关住院及住院总费用的能力。

方法

217份符合我们初步纳入标准的肯塔基大学患者记录,通过随机数生成算法选取44例患者进行全面病历审查,以收集计算2019年EULAR/ACR SLE分类标准评分所需的数据。住院总费用通过使用医院调整后的每日住院费用数据进行计算,该数据估计了医院提供服务所产生的费用,从而消除了保险类型导致的收费和报销差异。

结果

与初始门诊就诊后6个月内评分低于19分的患者相比,评分19分及以上的患者住院风险增加[=0.069]。初始评分≥19分的患者因狼疮住院的几率比评分<19分的患者高5.71倍。初始就诊时评分19分及以下的患者平均住院费用为14499美元,而评分>19分的患者平均住院费用为28725美元。

结论

本研究进一步证明,2019年EULAR/ACR SLE分类标准评分可作为评估疾病严重程度的替代指标。加权后的2019年EULAR/ACR SLE分类标准评分除了其寻找真正狼疮病例用于研究和临床试验的主要目标外,还提供了一个有前景的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95da/11780967/1ca02192544d/10.1177_09612033241310071-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95da/11780967/1ca02192544d/10.1177_09612033241310071-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95da/11780967/1ca02192544d/10.1177_09612033241310071-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE score predicts future lupus hospital admission and costs.2019年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准评分可预测未来狼疮患者的住院情况及费用。
Lupus. 2025 Feb;34(2):178-180. doi: 10.1177/09612033241310071. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
2
In an early SLE cohort the ACR-1997, SLICC-2012 and EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria classify non-overlapping groups of patients: use of all three criteria ensures optimal capture for clinical studies while their modification earlier classification and treatment.在一个早期 SLE 队列中,ACR-1997、SLICC-2012 和 EULAR/ACR-2019 标准将患者分为不重叠的组:使用所有三个标准可确保在修改早期分类和治疗时为临床研究提供最佳的捕获。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Feb;79(2):232-241. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216155. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
3
Comparison of systemic lupus international collaborating clinics 2012 classification criteria and European league against rheumatism/American college of rheumatology 2019 classification criteria for early detection of childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus (multi-center study).比较系统性红斑狼疮国际协作组 2012 分类标准与欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会 2019 年儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮早期检测分类标准(多中心研究)。
Lupus. 2024 May;33(6):629-637. doi: 10.1177/09612033241240830. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
4
Evaluating the performance of ACR, SLICC and EULAR/ACR classification criteria in childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus.评估 ACR、SLICC 和 EULAR/ACR 分类标准在儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮中的表现。
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2021 Sep 9;19(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12969-021-00619-w.
5
2019-EULAR/ACR classification criteria domains at diagnosis: predictive factors of long-term damage in systemic lupus erythematosus.2019 年 EULAR/ACR 分类标准的诊断域:系统性红斑狼疮长期损害的预测因素。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Apr;41(4):1079-1085. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05989-w. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
6
Utility of the 2019 EULAR/ACR SLE classification criteria for predicting mortality and hospitalisation: development and cross-validation of ominosity score.2019 年 EULAR/ACR SLE 分类标准预测死亡率和住院的效用:预后评分的制定和验证。
RMD Open. 2024 Nov 20;10(4):e004833. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004833.
7
Avoiding misclassification of thrombotic primary antiphospholipid syndrome as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): What are the best-performing SLE classification criteria?避免将血栓性原发性抗磷脂综合征误诊为系统性红斑狼疮(SLE):哪些是表现最佳的 SLE 分类标准?
Lupus. 2021 Oct;30(11):1732-1738. doi: 10.1177/09612033211033978. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
8
Comparison among ACR1997, SLICC and the new EULAR/ACR classification criteria in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.ACR1997、SLICC 与新的 EULAR/ACR 分类标准在儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮中的比较。
Adv Rheumatol. 2019 May 15;59(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s42358-019-0062-z.
9
Evolutionary trajectory of undifferentiated connective tissue disease and impact of 2019 EULAR/ACR systemic lupus erythematosus classification criteria: insights from a longitudinal study.未分化结缔组织病的演变轨迹及2019年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准的影响:一项纵向研究的见解
Clin Exp Med. 2025 May 1;25(1):134. doi: 10.1007/s10238-025-01668-1.
10
Relationship between the EULAR/ACR classification criteria and organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus.欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会分类标准与系统性红斑狼疮器官损伤之间的关系。
Lupus. 2023 Mar;32(3):424-430. doi: 10.1177/09612033231153791. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship between the EULAR/ACR classification criteria and organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus.欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会分类标准与系统性红斑狼疮器官损伤之间的关系。
Lupus. 2023 Mar;32(3):424-430. doi: 10.1177/09612033231153791. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
2
2019-EULAR/ACR classification criteria domains at diagnosis: predictive factors of long-term damage in systemic lupus erythematosus.2019 年 EULAR/ACR 分类标准的诊断域:系统性红斑狼疮长期损害的预测因素。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Apr;41(4):1079-1085. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05989-w. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
3
New EULAR/ACR 2019 SLE Classification Criteria: defining ominosity in SLE.
新的 2019 年 EULAR/ACR 系统性红斑狼疮分类标准:定义系统性红斑狼疮的凶险性。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jun;80(6):767-774. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218670. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
4
Comparison of Three Classification Criteria Sets for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Study Looking at Links to Outcome and Mortality.三种系统性红斑狼疮分类标准集的比较:一项着眼于结局和死亡率关联的研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Nov;72(11):1611-1614. doi: 10.1002/acr.24061.