Olesen Jes
Translational Research Center and Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Nordstjernevej 42, Glostrup, Copenhagen, 2600, Denmark.
J Headache Pain. 2024 Dec 19;25(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01903-2.
INTRODUCTION: It is largely accepted that migraine with aura (MA) is caused by cortical spreading depression (CSD) and that migraine without aura (MO) is not. This is mostly based on old studies of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and studies of vascular responses. These studies are partly forgotten today and may, therefore, be worthwhile reviewing. METHODS: The review is based on the authors life-long involvement in these issues and his knowledge of the relevant literature plus scrutiny of reference lists of these papers. RESULTS: The strongest evidence for CSD in MA came from studies using intraarterial injection of 133-Xenon and recording from 254 areas of the relevant hemisphere. Measurements could be taken before and during development of an attack because the procedure triggered MA. The findings were identical to many features of CSD. They were confirmed using 133-Xenon Single Photon Emission Computerized Tomography (SPECT).It was shown that the generally accepted vasospastic theory of migraine was incorrect. Headache started while rCBF was decreased and did not change during later hyperperfusion. rCBF remained normal in MO but later studies have shown increase in areas also activated by other pain. Flow Was focally increased in the brain stem also after treatment of the pain. Dilatation of large cerebral arteries during MO attack was first shown with ultrasound and later confirmed by MR angiography which also showed a lack of dilatation of extracerebral arteries. DISCUSSION: Much has in later years been done using modern PET and MR techniques. These studies have confirmed the old studies and have added many new aspects which are not reviewed here. The final proof of CSD during MA and its absence during MO still awaits the definitive study. CONCLUSION: Studies from the 1980ies and 1990ies caused a fundamental shift in our understanding of the vascular and cortical mechanisms of migraine. They remain a solid base for our current understanding and inspire further study.
引言:普遍认为伴先兆偏头痛(MA)由皮层扩散性抑制(CSD)引起,而无先兆偏头痛(MO)则不然。这主要基于早期关于局部脑血流(rCBF)的研究以及血管反应的研究。如今这些研究在一定程度上已被遗忘,因此或许值得回顾。 方法:本综述基于作者在这些问题上的毕生研究经历、对相关文献的了解以及对这些论文参考文献列表的审视。 结果:MA中CSD的最有力证据来自使用动脉内注射133 - 氙并在相关半球的254个区域进行记录的研究。由于该操作可引发MA,因此在发作前和发作过程中均可进行测量。研究结果与CSD的许多特征一致。使用133 - 氙单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)对其进行了验证。结果表明,普遍接受的偏头痛血管痉挛理论是错误的。头痛在rCBF降低时开始,在随后的血流过度灌注期间并无变化。MO患者的rCBF保持正常,但后期研究表明,在其他疼痛也会激活的区域血流增加。疼痛治疗后脑干血流也呈局灶性增加。MO发作期间大脑大动脉的扩张首先通过超声显示,随后经磁共振血管造影证实,该造影还显示脑外动脉无扩张。 讨论:近年来,利用现代PET和MR技术开展了大量研究。这些研究证实了早期研究结果,并增添了许多未在此处综述的新内容。MA期间CSD存在而MO期间不存在的最终证据仍有待确定性研究。 结论:20世纪80年代和90年代的研究使我们对偏头痛的血管和皮层机制的理解发生了根本性转变。它们仍是我们当前理解的坚实基础,并激发了进一步的研究。
J Headache Pain. 2024-12-19
Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev. 1991
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1992-4
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1992-4
Headache. 2007-9
Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 1995-12
Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 1987
Int J Mol Sci. 2025-8-21
Eur J Neurol. 2024-8
Prog Brain Res. 2020
Nat Rev Neurol. 2017-10-6