Dasgupta Indranil, Odudu Aghogho, Baharani Jyoti, Fergusson Niall, Griffiths Helen, Harrison John, Hameed Awais, Maruff Paul, Ryan Louise, Thomas Neil, Woodhall Gavin, Tadros George
Renal Unit, Heartlands Hospital, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK.
Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
BMC Nephrol. 2024 Dec 19;25(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12882-024-03883-6.
Cognitive impairment is common in haemodialysis patients with no known beneficial interventions. Cooler dialysate slows brain white-matter changes, but its effect on cognition is unknown. This feasibility trial was performed to inform a fully-powered, randomised trial to assess this.
We aimed to randomise (1:1) 90 haemodialysis patients to this double-blinded, randomised controlled feasibility trial to standard care (dialysate-temperature 36.5 °C) or intervention (35 °C). Eligible patients were adult chronic haemodialysis recipients with no established diagnosis of dementia or psychiatric disease. The primary outcome was change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score at 12-months. Secondary outcomes included recruitment and attrition rates, reasons for non-recruitment, intradialytic hypotension, depression, patient burden, computerised cognition test battery, and quality of life.
Of 334 patients screened, 160 were eligible. 99 declined mainly for the extra non-dialysis day study visits. Sixty-one patients consented, 43 randomised - 20 in standard care, 23 in intervention arms; 13 withdrew for non-dialysis day visits and 5 without reason before randomisation. 27 patients (12 standard care, 15 intervention) completed the trial - 5 died, 1 transplanted, 4 withdrew consent, and 6 could not attend due to the pandemic. Low temperature dialysis was well tolerated. There was no difference in change in MoCA from baseline to 12 months between the standard and intervention arms; 1.0 (-2.8-3.0, p = 0.755) and - 2.0 (-1.0 - -4.0, p = 0.047) respectively. There were no differences between groups on any secondary measures. There were no significant adverse events reported.
The trial was significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic contributing to an attrition rate of 27%. The non-dialysis day research visits were mainly responsible for low recruitment and consent withdrawal. There are several learning points, described in the article, which will inform design of definitive trials in this area in the future.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03645733. Registration date 24/08/2018.
认知障碍在血液透析患者中很常见,目前尚无已知的有益干预措施。较低温度的透析液可减缓脑白质变化,但其对认知的影响尚不清楚。进行这项可行性试验是为了为一项全面的随机试验提供信息,以评估这一影响。
我们旨在将90名血液透析患者按1:1随机分配至这项双盲随机对照可行性试验中,分别接受标准治疗(透析液温度36.5°C)或干预措施(35°C)。符合条件的患者为成年慢性血液透析患者,未确诊患有痴呆或精神疾病。主要结局是12个月时蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)评分的变化。次要结局包括招募率和失访率、未招募的原因、透析中低血压、抑郁、患者负担、计算机化认知测试组合以及生活质量。
在334名筛查的患者中,160名符合条件。99名患者拒绝参与,主要原因是额外的非透析日研究访视。61名患者同意参与,43名被随机分组——20名接受标准治疗,23名接受干预措施;13名因非透析日访视而退出,5名在随机分组前无故退出。27名患者(12名标准治疗组,15名干预组)完成了试验——5名死亡,1名接受移植,4名撤回同意,6名因疫情未能参加。低温透析耐受性良好。标准治疗组和干预组从基线到12个月MoCA评分的变化无差异;分别为1.0(-2.8至3.0,p = 0.755)和 -2.0(-1.0至 -4.0,p = 0.047)。两组在任何次要指标上均无差异。未报告重大不良事件。
该试验受到COVID-19大流行的显著影响,失访率达27%。非透析日的研究访视是招募率低和撤回同意的主要原因。本文描述了几个经验教训,将为该领域未来确定性试验的设计提供参考。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT03645733。注册日期2018年8月24日。