Bressan Miriana Maria, Musso Anna Maria, Bovi Tommaso, Bonetti Bruno, Zucchella Chiara
Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona VR, Italy.
Neurology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona VR, Italy.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Jan;103(1):268-281. doi: 10.1177/13872877241300186. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
Tele-neuropsychology has already been employed in neurocognitive disorders, however, in Italy, the evidence of its psychometric quality and satisfaction is still limited.
This study aimed to: (1) evaluate the reliability of a standardized battery of neuropsychological screening and domain-specific tests delivered at home via videoconference to a sample of Italian people with cognitive disorders, compared with traditional face-to-face administration; (2) assess the feasibility and satisfaction about remote administration.
This crossover study enrolled patients with subjective cognitive disorder, mild neurocognitive disorder, or dementia. All participants performed a brief neuropsychological screening assessment in face-to-face or remote mode. People with milder cognitive disorders (Mini-Mental State Examination ≥ 20) also performed an extended neuropsychological battery. After 15 days, each participant repeated the same assessment in the opposite mode. Finally, participants completed a satisfaction questionnaire.
114 participants were initially enrolled in the study and 100 individuals performed both face-to-face and remote assessments (14 dropouts). All neuropsychological tests showed agreement between the two modes of administration, except for the Digit Span Forward (= 0.009) and oral-Symbol Digit Modalities Test (< 0.001). According to Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCCs), tests also showed good or excellent reliability (LCCCs between 0.609 and 0.964); only the Digit Span Backward and the Stroop test showed moderate reliability (LCCCs =0.514-0.441, respectively). Among 100 participants, 65 patients answered the satisfaction questionnaire, declaring high satisfaction for the remote evaluation.
Tele-neuropsychology seems to work with in-home assessments among Italian patients with cognitive disorders and seems to be acceptable to them.
, Identifier: NCT06078332 (October 17, 2023).
远程神经心理学已应用于神经认知障碍领域,然而在意大利,其心理测量质量和满意度的证据仍然有限。
本研究旨在:(1)评估通过视频会议在家中向一组意大利认知障碍患者提供的标准化神经心理筛查和特定领域测试电池的可靠性,并与传统面对面施测进行比较;(2)评估远程施测的可行性和满意度。
这项交叉研究纳入了主观认知障碍、轻度神经认知障碍或痴呆患者。所有参与者均以面对面或远程模式进行了简短的神经心理筛查评估。认知障碍较轻(简易精神状态检查表≥20)的患者还进行了扩展的神经心理测试电池。15天后,每位参与者以相反模式重复相同评估。最后,参与者完成了一份满意度问卷。
最初有114名参与者纳入研究,100人进行了面对面和远程评估(14人退出)。除了顺背数字广度(=0.009)和言语-符号数字模式测试(<0.001)外,所有神经心理测试在两种施测模式之间均显示出一致性。根据林氏一致性相关系数(LCCC),测试也显示出良好或优异的可靠性(LCCC在0.609至0.964之间);只有倒背数字广度和斯特鲁普测试显示出中等可靠性(LCCC分别为0.514 - 0.441)。在100名参与者中,65名患者回答了满意度问卷,对远程评估表示高度满意。
远程神经心理学似乎适用于意大利认知障碍患者的家庭评估,并且他们似乎可以接受。
,标识符:NCT06(2023年10月17日)。 078332