Suppr超能文献

用于简化临床细胞因子定量的高灵敏度多重免疫分析平台的比较。

Comparison of highly sensitive, multiplex immunoassay platforms for streamlined clinical cytokine quantification.

作者信息

McKinski Kevin, Tang Huaping, Wang Kai, Birchler Mary, Wright Mike

机构信息

Precision Medicine - Biomarker & Bioanalytical Platforms (BBP), GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA.

Precision Medicine - Biomarker & Bioanalytical Platforms (BBP), GSK, Stevenage, UK.

出版信息

Bioanalysis. 2025 Jan;17(1):17-29. doi: 10.1080/17576180.2024.2442190. Epub 2024 Dec 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Selecting the optimal platforms to quantitate cytokines is challenging due to varying performance and the plethora of options available.

AIMS

To compare performance of three highly sensitive, multiplex assays on three different platforms - MSD S-plex, Olink Target 48, and Quanterix SP-X - to MSD V-plex which is widely used for quantitative cytokine assay.

METHODS

Serum and stimulated plasma samples were analyzed across each platform. The proportion of quantifiable samples was compared for each analyte and correlation analyses were performed to relate the data. For MSD S-plex, parallelism and antibody pair knockdown experiments gauged specificity of the kit.

RESULTS

MSD S-plex was the most sensitive multiplex platform followed by Olink Target 48, Quanterix SP-X, and MSD V-plex. Concentrations across platforms differed greatly for some cytokines, but all platforms showed strong correlation. Results for MSD S-plex were confirmed by parallelism and knockdown.

CONCLUSION

MSD S-plex should be a priority platform for ultra-sensitive assay. Olink Target 48 offers an enticing combination of sensitivity and multiplex capability that warrants consideration when many cytokines require quantitation. MSD V-plex, MSD S-plex and Olink quantitative assays offer high utility across drug development programs, but fit-for-purpose performance should be assessed on a per-analyte basis.

摘要

引言

由于性能各异且可用选项众多,选择用于定量细胞因子的最佳平台具有挑战性。

目的

将三种不同平台(MSD S-plex、Olink Target 48和Quanterix SP-X)上的三种高灵敏度多重检测方法的性能与广泛用于定量细胞因子检测的MSD V-plex进行比较。

方法

在每个平台上分析血清和刺激血浆样本。比较每种分析物可定量样本的比例,并进行相关性分析以关联数据。对于MSD S-plex,通过平行性和抗体对敲低实验评估试剂盒的特异性。

结果

MSD S-plex是最灵敏的多重平台,其次是Olink Target 48、Quanterix SP-X和MSD V-plex。某些细胞因子在各平台上的浓度差异很大,但所有平台均显示出强相关性。平行性和敲低实验证实了MSD S-plex的结果。

结论

MSD S-plex应作为超灵敏检测的优先平台。当需要定量多种细胞因子时,Olink Target 48提供了灵敏度和多重检测能力的诱人组合,值得考虑。MSD V-plex、MSD S-plex和Olink定量检测在整个药物研发项目中具有很高的实用性,但应根据每种分析物评估其适用性。

相似文献

6
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
9
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.

本文引用的文献

7
Cytokines: From Clinical Significance to Quantification.细胞因子:从临床意义到定量分析。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021 Aug;8(15):e2004433. doi: 10.1002/advs.202004433. Epub 2021 Jun 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验