Suppr超能文献

缝合悬吊成形术与韧带重建及肌腱植入治疗拇指腕掌关节关节炎的比较

Suture Suspensionplasty Compared With Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition for Surgical Treatment of Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis.

作者信息

Rivetti David A, Munsch Maria A, Wera Jeffrey C, Nguyen Duc M, Fowler John R

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Sep 13;6(6):861-864. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.07.014. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis is the most common arthritis of the hand, with most studies demonstrating little difference in outcomes between various surgical treatment techniques. However, trapeziectomy, followed by ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI), remains the technique of choice among hand surgeons in the United States. In 2009, suture suspensionplasty (SS) was first described as a less invasive alternative to LRTI. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical details as well as patient-reported and radiographic outcomes between SS and LRTI for thumb CMC arthroplasty.

METHODS

Following Institutional Review Board approval, 111 extremities were retrospectively identified in 104 patients who underwent carpometacarpal arthroplasty. Two age-matched cohorts were developed for patients having undergone LRTI (n = 58) or SS (n = 53) by one of three fellowship-trained hand surgeons. Tourniquet times were compared, and outcome measures included first metacarpal scaphoid space (FMSS) measured on 2-week postoperative radiographs, as well as Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score and pain score on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) from the preoperative visit as well as at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months following surgery.

RESULTS

There were no demographic differences between the two cohorts. There was no statistical difference between cohorts in VAS scores at any point in time. The SS cohort reported better DASH scores at the 6-week postoperative visit; otherwise, DASH scores did not differ between cohorts. The SS technique had shorter tourniquet times, and patients had less radiographic subsidence as evidenced by larger postoperative FMSS.

CONCLUSIONS

The SS arthroplasty technique demonstrated comparable early clinical results to LRTI. Furthermore, SS arthroplasty, which alleviates the need for tendon transfers and additional incisions with LRTI, had shorter tourniquet time, with less subsidence of the first metacarpal in the first 2 weeks.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

摘要

目的

拇指腕掌关节(CMC)关节炎是手部最常见的关节炎,大多数研究表明,各种手术治疗技术的疗效差异不大。然而,在美国,手外科医生中首选的技术仍是大多角骨切除术,随后进行韧带重建和肌腱植入(LRTI)。2009年,首次描述了缝线悬吊成形术(SS),作为LRTI的一种侵入性较小的替代方法。本研究的目的是比较SS和LRTI在拇指CMC关节成形术中的手术细节以及患者报告的结果和影像学结果。

方法

经机构审查委员会批准,对104例行腕掌关节成形术患者的111个肢体进行回顾性分析。由三位接受过专科培训 fellowship-trained的手外科医生之一,为接受LRTI(n = 58)或SS(n = 53)的患者建立两个年龄匹配的队列。比较止血带使用时间,结果指标包括术后2周X线片测量的第一掌骨舟状骨间隙(FMSS),以及术前、术后2周、6周和3个月时的手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾量表(DASH)评分和10分视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分。

结果

两组之间在人口统计学上没有差异。在任何时间点,两组之间的VAS评分均无统计学差异。SS组在术后6周时报告的DASH评分更好;除此之外,两组之间的DASH评分没有差异。SS技术的止血带使用时间更短,术后FMSS更大表明患者的影像学下沉更少。

结论

SS关节成形术技术显示出与LRTI相当的早期临床结果。此外,SS关节成形术无需进行LRTI中的肌腱转移和额外切口,止血带使用时间更短,在术后前2周第一掌骨下沉更少。

研究类型/证据水平:治疗性IV级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/870c/11652275/fa05eb17ac62/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验