Nizampuram Vamshi, Rajasekar Arvina
Department of Implantology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India.
Department of Periodontology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2025;35(1):45-49. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2024050057.
Although the surface modifications of the implant have been widely proposed to enhance the osseointegration, their impact on microbial adhesion is still not explored. The present in vitro study was done to compare the bacterial adhesion of S. mutans and Enterococcus faecalis on sand-blasted acid-etched and anodized titanium dental implants. Three commercially available implants, namely SLA (n = 3), SLActive (n = 3), and TiUnite (n = 3), were inoculated with the prepared broth suspension of S. mutans and E. faecalis, and were incubated at 37°C for 48 h. After incubation, the colonies were counted using direct microscopy and the results were recorded as colony forming units/mL (CFU/mL). Mean CFUs were compared between the three implants by ANOVA and pairwise comparison by Tukey's HSD post hoc test using SPSS Software. p value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. TiUnite implant showed the highest bacterial adherence for S. mutans (3.49 ± 0.53 × 102 CFU/mL) and E. faecalis (35.14 ± 1.54 × 102 CFU/mL) followed by SLA and SLActive. These data demonstrated statistically significant differences between the three types of implants (P < 0.05). Pairwise comparison showed that there was a statistically significant difference between SLA and TiUnite (P = 0.004) and SLActive and TiUnite (P = 0.001) in terms of S. mutans colony count. In terms of E. faecalis colony count, there was a statistically significant difference between SLA and SLActive (P = 0.000), SLA and TiUnite (P = 0.000) and SLActive and TiUnite (P = 0.000). Compared with sand-blasted and acid-etched dental implants, anodized dental implants showed higher adhesion of S. mutans and E. faecalis.
尽管人们广泛提出对种植体进行表面改性以增强骨整合,但它们对微生物黏附的影响仍未得到探索。本体外研究旨在比较变形链球菌和粪肠球菌在喷砂酸蚀和阳极氧化钛牙种植体上的细菌黏附情况。将三种市售种植体,即SLA(n = 3)、SLActive(n = 3)和TiUnite(n = 3),接种变形链球菌和粪肠球菌的制备肉汤悬液,并在37°C下孵育48小时。孵育后,使用直接显微镜计数菌落,并将结果记录为菌落形成单位/毫升(CFU/毫升)。使用SPSS软件通过方差分析(ANOVA)比较三种种植体之间的平均CFU,并通过Tukey's HSD事后检验进行两两比较。p值< 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。TiUnite种植体对变形链球菌(3.49 ± 0.53 × 102 CFU/毫升)和粪肠球菌(35.14 ± 1.54 × 102 CFU/毫升)的细菌黏附率最高,其次是SLA和SLActive。这些数据表明三种类型的种植体之间存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.05)。两两比较显示,在变形链球菌菌落计数方面,SLA和TiUnite之间(P = 0.