Ledda Roberta Eufrasia, Milanese Gianluca, Balbi Maurizio, Sabia Federica, Valsecchi Camilla, Ruggirello Margherita, Ciuni Andrea, Tringali Giulia, Sverzellati Nicola, Marchianò Alfonso Vittorio, Pastorino Ugo
Thoracic Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Eur Radiol. 2024 Dec 20. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11254-w.
To assess the consistency of automated measurements of coronary artery calcification (CAC) burden and emphysema extent on computed tomography (CT) images acquired with different radiation dose protocols in a lung cancer screening (LCS) population.
The patient cohort comprised 361 consecutive screenees who underwent a low-dose CT (LDCT) scan and an ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT) scan at an incident screening round. Exclusion criteria for CAC measurements were software failure and previous history of CVD, including coronary stenting, whereas for emphysema assessment, software failure only. CT images were retrospectively analyzed by a fully automated AI software for CAC scoring, using three predefined Agatston score categories (0-99, 100-399, and ≥ 400), and emphysema quantification, using the percentage of low attenuation areas (%LAA). Demographic and clinical data were obtained from the written questionnaire completed by each participant at the first visit. Agreement for CAC and %LAA categories was measured by the k-Cohen Index with Fleiss-Cohen weights (K) and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI).
An overlap of CAC strata was observed in 275/327 (84%) volunteers, with an almost perfect agreement (K = 0.86, 95% CI 0.82-0.90; ICC = 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.90), while an overlap of %LAA strata was found in 204/356 (57%) volunteers, with a moderate agreement (K = 0.57, 95% CI 0.51-0.63; ICC = 0.57, 95% CI 0.21-0.75).
Automated CAC quantification on ULDCT seems feasible, showing similar results to those obtained on LDCT, while the quantification of emphysema tended to be overestimated on ULDCT images.
Question Evidence demonstrating that coronary artery calcification and emphysema can be automatedly quantified on ultra-low-dose chest CT is still awaited. Findings Coronary artery calcification and emphysema measurements were similar among different CT radiation dose protocols; their automated quantification is feasible on ultra-low-dose CT. Clinical relevance Ultra-low-dose CT-based LCS might offer an opportunity to improve the secondary prevention of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases through automated quantification of both CAC burden and emphysema extent.
评估在肺癌筛查(LCS)人群中,使用不同辐射剂量方案获取的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像上,冠状动脉钙化(CAC)负荷和肺气肿程度自动测量的一致性。
患者队列包括361名在初次筛查轮次中接受低剂量CT(LDCT)扫描和超低剂量CT(ULDCT)扫描的连续筛查对象。CAC测量的排除标准为软件故障和既往心血管疾病史,包括冠状动脉支架置入术,而肺气肿评估的排除标准仅为软件故障。CT图像由一个全自动人工智能软件进行回顾性分析,用于CAC评分,采用三个预定义的阿加斯顿评分类别(0 - 99、100 - 399和≥400),以及肺气肿定量分析,采用低衰减区域百分比(%LAA)。人口统计学和临床数据从每位参与者首次就诊时填写的书面问卷中获取。通过带有Fleiss - Cohen权重的k - Cohen指数(K)和95%置信区间(CI)的组内相关系数(ICC)来测量CAC和%LAA类别的一致性。
在275/327(84%)的志愿者中观察到CAC分层重叠,一致性几乎完美(K = 0.86,95% CI 0.82 - 0.90;ICC = 0.86,95% CI 0.79 - 0.90),而在204/356(57%)的志愿者中发现%LAA分层重叠,一致性中等(K = 0.57,95% CI 0.51 - 0.63;ICC = 0.57,95% CI 0.21 - 0.75)。
ULDCT上的自动CAC定量似乎可行,结果与LDCT上获得的结果相似,而ULDCT图像上的肺气肿定量往往被高估。
问题 仍有待证据证明冠状动脉钙化和肺气肿可在超低剂量胸部CT上自动定量。发现 不同CT辐射剂量方案之间的冠状动脉钙化和肺气肿测量结果相似;它们在超低剂量CT上的自动定量是可行的。临床意义 基于超低剂量CT的LCS可能通过自动定量CAC负荷和肺气肿程度,为改善心血管和呼吸系统疾病的二级预防提供机会。