Listorti Elisabetta, Torbica Aleksandra, Esposito Giovanna, Franchi Matteo, Parazzini Fabio
Centre for Healthcare and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Dipartimento di Eccellenza 2023-2027, University of Milan, Milan, 20122, Italy.
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Dec 20;14(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00583-7.
With the rising spread of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), it becomes imperative to understand the determinants of resource utilization in ART versus spontaneous pregnancies to enhance policies directed to pregnancy care. The focus of our study is to examine the costs associated with ART from the perspective of the Italian NHS and to investigate in depth the contributing social and clinical factors.Using the healthcare informative system of Lombardy, a Region of Northern Italy, we gathered individual-level information for a cohort of women who experienced either spontaneous pregnancies or pregnancies following ART from 2007 until 2020. The information covered multiple healthcare services, and we used a propensity score matching technique to match couples of ART/No ART women based on a comprehensive set of confounders. We then applied statistical tests and regression models to identify the impact of ART on the reported cost differences.Our cohort was composed of 44652 women and results revealed significantly higher costs for ART pregnancies, especially in terms of hospital admissions (additional 1611€, 95% CI 1558-1666) and drug prescriptions (additional 216 €, CI 95% 204-228) occurring before delivery. In-depth analysis showed for ART pregnancies, i) a higher likelihood of incurring expenses related to complications and ii) higher costs associated with two established clinical practices that lack scientific evidence supporting their efficacy.Our study sheds light on the complex interplay of clinical and social factors influencing the ART burden, emphasizing the importance of tailored support and evidence-based practices in optimizing outcomes and resource allocation.
随着辅助生殖技术(ART)的日益普及,了解ART与自然妊娠中资源利用的决定因素对于加强针对妊娠护理的政策变得至关重要。我们研究的重点是从意大利国家医疗服务体系的角度审视与ART相关的成本,并深入调查相关的社会和临床因素。
利用意大利北部伦巴第大区的医疗信息系统,我们收集了2007年至2020年期间经历自然妊娠或ART后妊娠的一组女性的个人层面信息。这些信息涵盖了多种医疗服务,我们使用倾向得分匹配技术,根据一组全面的混杂因素对ART/非ART女性进行匹配。然后,我们应用统计检验和回归模型来确定ART对报告的成本差异的影响。
我们的队列由44652名女性组成,结果显示ART妊娠的成本显著更高,尤其是在分娩前的住院费用(额外1611欧元,95%可信区间1558 - 1666)和药物处方费用(额外216欧元,95%可信区间204 - 228)方面。深入分析表明,对于ART妊娠,i)发生与并发症相关费用的可能性更高,ii)与两种缺乏科学证据支持其疗效的既定临床实践相关的成本更高。
我们的研究揭示了影响ART负担的临床和社会因素之间的复杂相互作用,强调了在优化结果和资源分配方面提供量身定制的支持和循证实践的重要性。