Hashinokuchi Asato, Akamine Takaki, Toyokawa Gouji, Matsudo Kyoto, Nagano Taichi, Kinoshita Fumihiko, Kohno Mikihiro, Tomonaga Takumi, Kohashi Kenichi, Shimokawa Mototsugu, Oda Yoshinao, Takenaka Tomoyoshi, Yoshizumi Tomoharu
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Clinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Medical Center, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 Dec 25;40(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae181.
Spread through air spaces (STAS) is considered a poor prognostic factor in patients with resected non-small lung cell cancer; however, the clinical significance of STAS extent remains unclear. We hypothesized that the further the tumour cells spread from the tumour edge, the worse the prognosis becomes.
This study retrospectively reviewed the data of 642 patients with completely resected pathological stage I-III non-small lung cell cancer between 2008 and 2018. The maximum spread distance (MSD) from the tumour edge to the farthest STAS was quantitatively evaluated, and STAS was categorized as limited (MSD ≤1000 μm) or extended (MSD >1000 μm), based on the median MSD. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared among patients stratified by STAS classification.
Patients were classified into STAS-negative (n = 382, 59.6%), limited STAS (n = 130, 20.2%) and extended STAS (n = 130, 20.2%) groups. Extended STAS was associated with a high maximum standardized uptake value, advanced pathological stage and vascular invasion compared with limited STAS. The extended STAS group demonstrated significantly shorter RFS and OS than both the limited STAS and STAS-negative groups (both P < 0.001 for RFS; P = 0.007 and P < 0.001 for OS, respectively). Multivariable analysis showed that extended STAS was an independent prognostic factor for both RFS and OS (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively).
The distance from tumour edge to STAS affects prognosis in patients with completely resected non-small lung cell cancer.
IRB approval number: 2019-232.
气腔播散(STAS)被认为是肺非小细胞癌切除患者预后不良的因素;然而,STAS范围的临床意义仍不明确。我们假设肿瘤细胞从肿瘤边缘扩散得越远,预后越差。
本研究回顾性分析了2008年至2018年间642例完全切除的病理I-III期肺非小细胞癌患者的数据。定量评估从肿瘤边缘到最远STAS的最大扩散距离(MSD),并根据MSD中位数将STAS分为局限型(MSD≤1000μm)或扩展型(MSD>1000μm)。比较按STAS分类分层的患者的无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)。
患者分为STAS阴性组(n = 382,59.6%)、局限型STAS组(n = 130,20.2%)和扩展型STAS组(n = 130,20.2%)。与局限型STAS相比,扩展型STAS与高最大标准化摄取值、晚期病理分期和血管侵犯相关。扩展型STAS组的RFS和OS明显短于局限型STAS组和STAS阴性组(RFS均P < 0.001;OS分别为P = 0.007和P < 0.001)。多变量分析显示,扩展型STAS是RFS和OS的独立预后因素(分别为P < 0.001,P < 0.001)。
肿瘤边缘到STAS的距离影响完全切除的肺非小细胞癌患者的预后。
机构审查委员会批准号:2019 - 232。