Akumbom Alvine M, Bergman Alanna J, Strickler Howard, Budhathoki Chakra, Nkimbeng Manka, Grant Raeven, Reynolds Nancy R, Talaat Kawsar R
Center for Infectious Disease and Nursing Innovation, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 20;4(12):e0003931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003931. eCollection 2024.
Coinfection with human papillomavirus (HPV) and HIV compounds the risks of developing cervical, anal, and HPV-associated oral neoplasia. Safe prophylactic vaccines are available to prevent HPV infections in people with HIV(PWH). Yet, vaccine efficacy and duration of protection remain questionable. Historically, the efficacy of vaccines has been suboptimal in PWH compared to people without HIV (PWoH).A systematic review of HPV vaccine trials in PWH was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes of interest were vaccine efficacy, immunogenicity, and predictors of HPV vaccine efficacy. A secondary outcome was to assess age and sex differences. Efficacy was reviewed as cervical/anal/oral lesions or neoplasia, and incident or persistent HPV infection following vaccination. A random effects meta-analysis was performed comparing geometric mean titer (GMT) in PWH to PWoH. Twenty-eight studies out of 988 were eligible for inclusion in our study, and qualitatively synthesized. Eight of these studies were meta-analyzed. GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges's g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges's g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. The mean difference in GMT for HPV18 between PWH and PWoH was -536.23 (95% CI: -830.66, -241.81); approximately 22 times higher than HPV18 seropositivity cut-offs, assuming milli-Merck Units per milliliter. Risk factors for incident or persistent infections in PWH included: failure to seroconvert after vaccination, baseline CD4+ T-cell count <500 cells/mm3, early age of sexual debut, HIV viral load ≥ 400 copies/mL. There was a trend towards decreased HPV vaccine efficacy in studies that included enrollees with a history of AIDS or AIDS-defining illness.Applying existing evidence of HPV vaccine efficacy on meaningful clinical outcomes in PWH is questionable. This could be influenced by the diversity of eligibility criteria across clinical trials of HPV vaccine efficacy. Precision medicine may offer novel alternatives for evaluating HPV vaccine efficacy in PWH.
人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)与人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)合并感染会增加患宫颈癌、肛门癌和HPV相关口腔肿瘤的风险。有安全的预防性疫苗可用于预防HIV感染者(PWH)的HPV感染。然而,疫苗效力和保护持续时间仍存在疑问。从历史上看,与未感染HIV的人(PWoH)相比,疫苗在PWH中的效力一直不太理想。
使用PRISMA指南对PWH中的HPV疫苗试验进行了系统评价。感兴趣的结果是疫苗效力、免疫原性以及HPV疫苗效力的预测因素。次要结果是评估年龄和性别差异。效力通过宫颈/肛门/口腔病变或肿瘤以及接种疫苗后发生的或持续的HPV感染来评价。进行了随机效应荟萃分析,比较了PWH与PWoH中的几何平均滴度(GMT)。988项研究中有28项符合纳入我们研究的条件,并进行了定性综合分析。其中8项研究进行了荟萃分析。HPV16和HPV18基因型的GMT结果在PWH中显著较低;Hedges's g分别为-0.434(95% CI:-0.823,-0.046)和-0.57(95% CI:-0.72,-0.43)。PWH与PWoH之间HPV18的GMT平均差异为-536.23(95% CI:-830.66,-241.81);假设每毫升毫默克单位,约比HPV18血清阳性临界值高22倍。PWH中发生或持续感染的危险因素包括:接种疫苗后未发生血清转化、基线CD4+ T细胞计数<500个细胞/mm3、初次性行为年龄较小、HIV病毒载量≥400拷贝/mL。在纳入有艾滋病病史或艾滋病定义疾病病史受试者的研究中,HPV疫苗效力有降低的趋势。
将HPV疫苗效力的现有证据应用于PWH有意义的临床结果存在疑问。这可能受到HPV疫苗效力临床试验中纳入标准多样性的影响。精准医学可能为评估PWH中的HPV疫苗效力提供新的选择。