Arora Sahil, Upadhayay Shubham, Kumar Pradeep, Kumar Puneet, Kumar Raj
Laboratory for Drug Design and Synthesis, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Natural Products, School of Health Sciences, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda 151 401, India.
Department of Pharmacology, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, Punjab 151401, India.
Bioorg Chem. 2025 Jan;154:108043. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2024.108043. Epub 2024 Dec 7.
In this study, we herein report the design, synthesis, and anticancer assessment of a series of new 4-substituted 5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobenzo[4,5]thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidines. The synthesis involved key intermediates such as the 2-aminoester derivative, which underwent a series of reactions to produce compounds 7a-7t. The optimized SAr reactions, utilizing microwave irradiation in DMF, led to high yields and efficient preparation of the desired compounds. The biological evaluation revealed significant cytotoxicity of compounds 7b and 7t against MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines with IC values of 8.80 ± 0.08 and 7.45 ± 0.26 µM, respectively, demonstrating superior activity to standard controls like camptothecin and etoposide. Both the compounds exhibited dual topoisomerase I and II inhibition (7t > 7b), enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in cancer cells, and halted cell cycle at the G2/M phase. Molecular docking and dynamics simulations further supported the higher binding affinity of compound 7t to topoisomerase enzymes compared to 7b and standard compounds. In silico ADME profiling of 7b and 7t confirmed their drug-likeness, while DFT calculations provided insight into their electronic properties.
在本研究中,我们在此报告了一系列新型4-取代的5,6,7,8-四氢苯并[4,5]噻吩并[2,3-d]嘧啶的设计、合成及抗癌评估。合成过程涉及关键中间体,如2-氨基酯衍生物,其经过一系列反应生成化合物7a - 7t。利用微波辐射在N,N-二甲基甲酰胺(DMF)中进行的优化亲核芳香取代(SAr)反应,可高产率且高效地制备所需化合物。生物学评价显示,化合物7b和7t对MCF - 7乳腺癌细胞系具有显著的细胞毒性,IC值分别为8.80 ± 0.08和7.45 ± 0.26 μM,表明其活性优于喜树碱和依托泊苷等标准对照物。这两种化合物均表现出对拓扑异构酶I和II的双重抑制作用(7t > 7b),增强了癌细胞中活性氧(ROS)的生成,并使细胞周期停滞在G2/M期。分子对接和动力学模拟进一步支持了与7b和标准化合物相比,化合物7t对拓扑异构酶具有更高的结合亲和力。对7b和7t进行的计算机辅助药物代谢动力学(ADME)分析证实了它们的类药性质,而密度泛函理论(DFT)计算则深入了解了它们的电子性质。